Cited by 62Gender Studies in LanguageGender and Feminist StudiesSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Attitudes toward women mediate the gender effect on attitudes toward sexist language

Parks, Janet B., Mary Ann, Roberton·2004·Psychology of Women Quarterly

Abstract

Studies of attitudes toward sexist language have consistently revealed a gender gap, with women considerably more supportive of inclusive language than men. The present study investigated this gender gap in the presence of “attitudes toward women,” a potential mediator variable. Participants were a convenience sample of 18- to 20-year-old college students ( N = 278). Most were European American/White (87%) women (60%). Data were collected using the Modern Sexism Scale, Neosexism Scale, Attitudes Toward Women Scale, and Inventory of Attitudes Toward Sexist/Nonsexist Language-General. The customary gender gap in attitudes toward sexist language was found in this sample. Regression tests of mediation, however, revealed that when measures of attitudes toward women were included in the analysis, the gender effect diminished by as much as 61% ( p < .01). These findings provide empirical evidence of a link between attitudes toward sexist language and the cultural construct, attitudes toward women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00140.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Parks, J. B., & Mary Ann, R.
Affiliations
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • Distinguished Teaching Professor, works in the Sport Management, Recreation, and Tourism Division of the School of Human Movement, Sport, and Leisure Studies at Bowling Green State University. Mary Ann Roberton is a Professor in the Kinesiology Division of the same school.
Venue
Psychology of Women Quarterly
Published
2004-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
233-239
ISSN
  • 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-6402
OpenAlex
W2155368420
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Women Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
sexist language, gender gap, attitudes toward women, modern sexism, neosexism, inclusive language, mediation, gender differences, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review