Rivers in peril inside and outside protected areas: a systematic approach to conservation assessment of river ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
This paper establishes a framework within which a rapid and pragmatic assessment of river ecosystems can be undertaken at a broad, subcontinental scale, highlighting some implications for achieving conservation of river biodiversity in water‐limited countries. The status of river ecosystems associated with main rivers in South Africa was assessed based on the extent to which each ecosystem had been altered from its natural condition. This requires consistent data on river integrity for the entire country, which was only available for main rivers; tributaries were thus excluded from the analyses. The state of main river ecosystems in South Africa is dire: 84% of the ecosystems are threatened, with a disturbing 54% critically endangered, 18% endangered, and 12% vulnerable. Protection levels were measured as the proportion of conservation target achieved within protected areas, where the conservation target was set as 20% of the total length of each river ecosystem. Sixteen of the 112 main river ecosystems are moderately to well represented within protected areas; the majority of the ecosystems have very low levels of representation, or are not represented at all within protected areas. Only 50% of rivers within protected areas are intact, but this is a higher proportion compared to rivers outside (28%), providing some of the first quantitative data on the positive role protected areas can play in conserving river ecosystems. This is also the first assessment of river ecosystems…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Riverine habitats can be poorly represented in protected areas but are presumably critical for the pygmy hippopotamus.
“Furthermore, riverine habitats can be poorly represented in protected areas (Nel et al., ) but are presumably critical for the pygmy hippopotamus, and in fact protected area status can mean little in a region where many are poorly funded and ineffective (Brugière, ; Henschel et al., ).”
From A mix of community-based conservation and protected forests is needed for the survival of the Endangered pygmy hippopotamus<i>Choeropsis liberiensis</i> (2017) · cites this paper as Nel et al., 2007
Cites
Riverine landscapes: Biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation
Ward, J. V. (1998) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(97)00083-9 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Progress and challenges in freshwater conservation planning
Nel, J. L., Roux, D. J., Abell, R., Ashton, P. J., Cowling, R. M., Higgins, J. V., Thieme, M., & Viers, J. H. (2009) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.1010 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Self-citationHermoso, V., Kennard, M. J., & Linke, S. (2012) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00879.x · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Hillers, A., Buchanan, G. M., Garteh, J. C., Tommy, S. M., Fofana, M. L., & Lindsell, J. A. (2017) · Oryx · doi:10.1017/s003060531600020x · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nel, J. L., Roux, D. J., Maree, G., Kleynhans, C. J., Moolman, J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., & Cowling, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
- South African National Biodiversity Institute (ZA)
- Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Nel, Jeanne L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diversity and Distributions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-352
- ISSN
- 0967-9952 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-9516
- 1472-4642
- OpenAlex
- W2137541331
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diversity and Distributions (publishedVersion)
- Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
- Keywords
- river ecosystems, protected areas, conservation status assessment, ecological state, tributaries, river connectivity, river basin management, freshwater conservation, South Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review