Cited by 229Fish Ecology and Management StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

Rivers in peril inside and outside protected areas: a systematic approach to conservation assessment of river ecosystems

Open access
Nel, Jeanne L., Roux, Dirk J., Maree, Gillian, Kleynhans, Cornelius J., Moolman, Juanita, Reyers, Belinda, Rouget, Mathieu, Cowling, Richard M.·2007·Diversity and Distributions

Abstract

This paper establishes a framework within which a rapid and pragmatic assessment of river ecosystems can be undertaken at a broad, subcontinental scale, highlighting some implications for achieving conservation of river biodiversity in water‐limited countries. The status of river ecosystems associated with main rivers in South Africa was assessed based on the extent to which each ecosystem had been altered from its natural condition. This requires consistent data on river integrity for the entire country, which was only available for main rivers; tributaries were thus excluded from the analyses. The state of main river ecosystems in South Africa is dire: 84% of the ecosystems are threatened, with a disturbing 54% critically endangered, 18% endangered, and 12% vulnerable. Protection levels were measured as the proportion of conservation target achieved within protected areas, where the conservation target was set as 20% of the total length of each river ecosystem. Sixteen of the 112 main river ecosystems are moderately to well represented within protected areas; the majority of the ecosystems have very low levels of representation, or are not represented at all within protected areas. Only 50% of rivers within protected areas are intact, but this is a higher proportion compared to rivers outside (28%), providing some of the first quantitative data on the positive role protected areas can play in conserving river ecosystems. This is also the first assessment of river ecosystems…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00308.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nel, J. L., Roux, D. J., Maree, G., Kleynhans, C. J., Moolman, J., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., & Cowling, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
  • South African National Biodiversity Institute (ZA)
  • Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Nel, Jeanne L.
Venue
Diversity and Distributions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-04-06
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
341-352
ISSN
  • 0967-9952 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-9516
  • 1472-4642
OpenAlex
W2137541331
Cited by
229
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diversity and Distributions (publishedVersion)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
river ecosystems, protected areas, conservation status assessment, ecological state, tributaries, river connectivity, river basin management, freshwater conservation, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review