Cited by 136Fish Ecology and Management StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Integrating multidirectional connectivity requirements in systematic conservation planning for freshwater systems

Open access
Hermoso, Virgilio, Kennard, Mark J., Linke, Simon·2012·Diversity and Distributions

Abstract

Aim Recent efforts to apply the principles of systematic conservation planning to freshwater ecosystems have focused on the special connected nature of these systems as a way to ensure adequacy (long‐term maintenance of biodiversity). Connectivity is important in maintaining biodiversity and key ecological processes in freshwater environments and is of special relevance for conservation planning in these systems. However, freshwater conservation planning has focused on longitudinal connectivity requirements within riverine ecosystems, while other habitats, such as floodplain wetlands or lakes and connections among them, have been overlooked. Here, we address this gap by incorporating a new component of connectivity in addition to the traditional longitudinal measure. Location Northern Australia. Methods We integrate lateral connections between freshwater areas (e.g. lakes and wetlands) that are not directly connected by the river network and the longitudinal upstream–downstream connections. We demonstrate how this can be used to incorporate ecological requirements of some water‐dependent taxa that can move across drainage divides, such as waterbirds. Results When applied together, the different connectivity rules allow the identification of priority areas that contain whole lakes or wetlands, their closest neighbours whenever possible, and the upstream/downstream reaches of rivers that flow into or from them. This would facilitate longitudinal and lateral movements of biota while minimizing the influence of disturbances potentially received from upstream or downstream reaches. Main conclusions This new approach to defining and applying different connectivity rules can help improve the adequacy of freshwater‐protected areas by enhancing movements of biodiversity within priority areas. The integration of multiple connectivity needs can also serve as a bridge to integrate freshwater and terrestrial conservation planning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00879.x

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When identified and managed with the needs of inland water biodiversity in mind, mechanisms for protection can include protected areas like national parks and biosphere reserves, other effective area-based measures like community-managed river reserves, and inland water-focused tools like national river conservation systems, specific laws and edicts and Rights of Rivers.

    “When identified and managed with the needs of inland water biodiversity in mind, mechanisms for protection can include protected areas like national parks and biosphere reserves, other effective area-based measures like community-managed river reserves, 77 as well as inland water-focused tools like national river conservation systems, specific laws and edicts and the relatively new concept of”

    From Protecting and restoring habitats to benefit freshwater biodiversity (2024) · cites this paper as [79]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Abell, R., Thieme, M., Dinerstein, E. & Olson, D. (2002) A sourcebook for conducting biological assessments and developing biodiversity visions for ecoregion conservation. Volume II: Freshwater ecoregions. World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C., USA.
  2. Hermoso, V., Kennard, M., Pusey, B. & Douglas, M. (2011a) Identifying priority areas for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity. Aquatic biodiversity of the Wet-Dry Topics of Northern Australia: patterns, impacts and future (ed. by B. J. Pusey), Charles Darwin University Press, Darwin.
  3. Pusey, B., Kennard, M., Burrows, D., Perna, C., Kyne, P., Cook, B. & Hughes, J. (2011) Freshwater fish. Aquatic biodiversity of the Wet-Dry Topics of Northern Australia: patterns, impacts and future. (ed. By B. J. Pusey), Charles Darwin University Press, Darwin.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hermoso, V., Kennard, M. J., & Linke, S.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hermoso, Virgilio
Venue
Diversity and Distributions
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-04
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
448-458
ISSN
  • 0967-9952 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-9516
  • 1472-4642
OpenAlex
W1787092137
Cited by
136
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diversity and Distributions (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Water Commission
  • Australian Government
  • Fisheries Research and Development Corporation
  • Griffith University
  • Queensland Government
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
systematic conservation planning, freshwater ecosystems, connectivity, lateral connections, longitudinal connectivity, floodplain wetlands, lakes, waterbirds, drainage divide, priority areas, biodiversity conservation, northern Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review