The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success
Abstract
We identify a significant relationship between domestic market‐based propagule pressure, as measured both in presence in the British horticultural market and in seed prices of ornamental plant species, with success in invasion. We employ a multispecies temporal approach and use a Generalized Estimation Equation model comparing ornamental non‐native species introduced into Britain which started to invade with species introduced but not known outside cultivation. Historical nursery catalogues gave information on the availability and prices of seeds of 506 ornamental species in the British horticultural market every 20 years from 1885 to 1985. Higher market frequency and cheap prices of seeds were more significant and had a greater impact on the invading probability 20 years later than at the date of listing in a nursery catalogue. Our results suggest that national economic factors are an important part of the explanation for the invasiveness of ornamental plant species, and hence for the development of potential solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders
Kolar, C. S., & Lodge, D. M. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02101-2 · Cited by 2,825
Lag times and exotic species: The ecology and management of biological invasions in slow-motion1
Crooks, J. A. (2005) · Écoscience · doi:10.2980/i1195-6860-12-3-316.1 · Cited by 758
A hotspot of non-native marine fishes: evidence for the aquarium trade as an invasion pathway
Semmens, B., Buhle, E., Salomon, A., & Pattengill-Semmens, C. (2004) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps266239 · Cited by 277
Cited by
Invasive Species, Environmental Change and Management, and Health
Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2010) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-033009-095548 · Cited by 1,406
Global change, global trade, and the next wave of plant invasions
Bradley, B. A., Blumenthal, D. M., Early, R., Grosholz, E. D., Lawler, J. J., Miller, L. P., Sorte, C. J., D'Antonio, C. M., Diez, J. M., Dukes, J. S., et al. (2012) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/110145 · Cited by 244
Pergl, J., Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Essl, F., Genovesi, P., Harrower, C. A., Hulme, P. E., Jeschke, J. E., Kenis, M., Kühn, I., et al. (2017) · NeoBiota · doi:10.3897/neobiota.32.10199 · Cited by 90
Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany
Hanspach, J., Kühn, I., Pyšek, P., Boos, E., & Klotz, S. (2008) · Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics · doi:10.1016/j.ppees.2008.05.001 · Cited by 88
Maurel, N., Hanspach, J., Kühn, I., Pyšek, P., & van Kleunen, M. (2016) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.12520 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Dehnen‐Schmutz, K., Touza, J., Perrings, C., & Williamson, M.
- Venue
- Diversity and Distributions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 527-534
- ISSN
- 0967-9952 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-9516
- 1472-4642
- OpenAlex
- W1518638615
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00359.x
- The paper
- Dehnen‐Schmutz, K., Touza, J., Perrings, C., & Williamson, M. (2007). A century of the ornamental plant trade and its impact on invasion success. Diversity and Distributions. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00359.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
