Cited by 141thermodynamics and calorimetric analysesMicrobial metabolism and enzyme functionMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

A thermodynamic assessment of energy requirements for biomass synthesis by chemolithoautotrophic micro‐organisms in oxic and anoxic environments

MCCOLLOM, T. M., AMEND, J. P.·2005·Geobiology

Abstract

The flow of metabolic energy is arguably the most fundamental property governing ecosystem structure. In many microbial communities, particularly those that inhabit environments with little input of exogenous organic matter such as submarine hydrothermal systems and deep subsurface environments, chemolithoautotrophic organisms generate most of the organic matter available to support heterotrophic growth. In these environments, inorganic chemical reactions constitute the main source of energy input to the system, and the conversion of chemical energy to biomass by chemolithoautotrophs exerts a prominent control on the size, composition, and trophic structure of the biological community. A rigorous accounting of energy flow would aid in understanding the potential biological productivity of chemolithoautotrophic communities and help clarify the limits to habitability in geothermal and subsurface environments. In a step towards achieving a more complete accounting of energy flow in such communities, we present here computations to quantify the amount of thermodynamic energy required to synthesize the molecular components of biomass and to compare the relative energy requirements under oxic and anoxic conditions. The results suggest that only about 10% or less of the overall energy consumed during growth by chemolithoautotrophs is transformed directly into biomass. In addition, the results indicate aerobic organisms require approximately 17 kJ (g cells)−1 more energy than anaerobes to synthesize the same biomass. This advantage may help explain why anaerobic organisms appear to yield greater biomass per unit energy input than aerobic organisms in laboratory growth studies, and why anaerobic micro‐organisms can exist where the energy yield from catabolism is extremely low.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2005.00045.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amino acids are thermodynamically favoured over nucleotides and thus more likely to accumulate in larger amounts in a hydrothermal setting.

    “Amino acids are thermodynamically favoured over nucleotides and thus more likely to accumulate in larger amounts in a hydrothermal setting anyway [35,36]; similarly in metabolism, some might spill over into RNA-like bases.”

    From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

  • The synthesis of cell mass requires 13-fold greater energy input under microoxic than under anoxic conditions.

    “Specifically, the synthesis of cell mass requires 13-fold greater energy input (or even more if NO3– is the nitrogen source) under microoxic than under anoxic conditions [35].”

    From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

  • Anaerobic chemolithoautotrophs such as methanogens require of the order of 30-40 kJ to synthesize a gram of cell mass, whereas aerobes require of the order of 80-170 kJ to synthesize a gram of cell mass.

    “That meshes with the observations of Heijnen & van Dijken [213] that anaerobic chemolithoautotrophs such as methanogens require of the order of 30–40 kJ to synthesize a gram of cell mass, whereas aerobes require of the order of 80–170 kJ to synthesize a gram of cell mass [35].”

    From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

  • The argument that high-potential electron acceptors for methane oxidation were needed to get organic synthesis started has the problem that their presence would tend to preclude accumulation of reduced organic compounds such as amino acids because the reducing conditions would be gone.

    “Thus, the argument that high-potential electron acceptors for methane oxidation were needed to get organic synthesis started [212] has the problem that their presence would tend to preclude accumulation of reduced organic compounds such as amino acids [35], because the reducing conditions would be gone.”

    From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MCCOLLOM, T. M., & AMEND, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
MCCOLLOM, T. M.
Venue
Geobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
135-144
ISSN
  • 1472-4669 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-4677
OpenAlex
W1968096801
Cited by
141
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Geobiology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
biomass synthesis, energy flow, oxic and anoxic conditions, submarine hydrothermal systems, microbial productivity, geothermal environments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review