A thermodynamic assessment of energy requirements for biomass synthesis by chemolithoautotrophic micro‐organisms in oxic and anoxic environments
Abstract
The flow of metabolic energy is arguably the most fundamental property governing ecosystem structure. In many microbial communities, particularly those that inhabit environments with little input of exogenous organic matter such as submarine hydrothermal systems and deep subsurface environments, chemolithoautotrophic organisms generate most of the organic matter available to support heterotrophic growth. In these environments, inorganic chemical reactions constitute the main source of energy input to the system, and the conversion of chemical energy to biomass by chemolithoautotrophs exerts a prominent control on the size, composition, and trophic structure of the biological community. A rigorous accounting of energy flow would aid in understanding the potential biological productivity of chemolithoautotrophic communities and help clarify the limits to habitability in geothermal and subsurface environments. In a step towards achieving a more complete accounting of energy flow in such communities, we present here computations to quantify the amount of thermodynamic energy required to synthesize the molecular components of biomass and to compare the relative energy requirements under oxic and anoxic conditions. The results suggest that only about 10% or less of the overall energy consumed during growth by chemolithoautotrophs is transformed directly into biomass. In addition, the results indicate aerobic organisms require approximately 17 kJ (g cells)−1 more energy than anaerobes to synthesize the same biomass. This advantage may help explain why anaerobic organisms appear to yield greater biomass per unit energy input than aerobic organisms in laboratory growth studies, and why anaerobic micro‐organisms can exist where the energy yield from catabolism is extremely low.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Amino acids are thermodynamically favoured over nucleotides and thus more likely to accumulate in larger amounts in a hydrothermal setting.
“Amino acids are thermodynamically favoured over nucleotides and thus more likely to accumulate in larger amounts in a hydrothermal setting anyway [35,36]; similarly in metabolism, some might spill over into RNA-like bases.”
From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [35]
The synthesis of cell mass requires 13-fold greater energy input under microoxic than under anoxic conditions.
“Specifically, the synthesis of cell mass requires 13-fold greater energy input (or even more if NO3– is the nitrogen source) under microoxic than under anoxic conditions [35].”
From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [35]
Anaerobic chemolithoautotrophs such as methanogens require of the order of 30-40 kJ to synthesize a gram of cell mass, whereas aerobes require of the order of 80-170 kJ to synthesize a gram of cell mass.
“That meshes with the observations of Heijnen & van Dijken [213] that anaerobic chemolithoautotrophs such as methanogens require of the order of 30–40 kJ to synthesize a gram of cell mass, whereas aerobes require of the order of 80–170 kJ to synthesize a gram of cell mass [35].”
From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [35]
The argument that high-potential electron acceptors for methane oxidation were needed to get organic synthesis started has the problem that their presence would tend to preclude accumulation of reduced organic compounds such as amino acids because the reducing conditions would be gone.
“Thus, the argument that high-potential electron acceptors for methane oxidation were needed to get organic synthesis started [212] has the problem that their presence would tend to preclude accumulation of reduced organic compounds such as amino acids [35], because the reducing conditions would be gone.”
From Early bioenergetic evolution (2013) · cites this paper as [35]
Cites
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2005), and their potential contribution to global biomass production and the global C cycle are just beginning to be appreciated (Whitman et al., 1998).”
BackgroundEnergy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., & Decker, K. (1977) · Bacteriological Reviews · doi:10.1128/br.41.1.100-180.1977 · Cited by 4,146 · see citing works
On the possibility of chemosynthetic ecosystems in subsurface habitats on Mars
Boston, P. J., Ivanov, M. V., & P. McKay, C. (1992) · Icarus · doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90045-9 · Cited by 325 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…may represent analogues of the earliest biological communities to inhabit the Earth or of microbial communities that might exist on other planetary bodies such as Mars and Europa (e.g. Boston et al ., 1992; Jakosky & Shock, 1998; Fisk & Giovannoni, 1999; McCollom, 1999; Martin & Russell, 2003).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sousa, F. L., Thiergart, T., Landan, G., Nelson-Sathi, S., Pereira, I. A. C., Allen, J. F., Lane, N., & Martin, W. F. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0088 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
“Amino acids are thermodynamically favoured over nucleotides and thus more likely to accumulate in larger amounts in a hydrothermal setting anyway [35,36]; similarly in metabolism, some might spill over into RNA-like bases.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSerpentinite and the dawn of life
Sleep, N. H., Bird, D. K., & Pope, E. C. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0129 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Schönheit, P., Buckel, W., & Martin, W. F. (2016) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2015.10.003 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Sousa, F. L., & Martin, W. F. (2014) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.02.001 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Does aspartic acid racemization constrain the depth limit of the subsurface biosphere?
Onstott, T. C., Magnabosco, C., Aubrey, A. D., Burton, A. S., Dworkin, J. P., Elsila, J. E., Grunsfeld, S., Cao, B. H., Hein, J. E., Glavin, D. P., et al. (2014) · Geobiology · doi:10.1111/gbi.12069 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
The metabolic network of the last bacterial common ancestor
Xavier, J. C., Gerhards, R. E., Wimmer, J. L. E., Brueckner, J., Tria, F. D. K., & Martin, W. F. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01918-4 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Energetics of amino acid synthesis in alkaline hydrothermal environments
Kitadai, N. (2015) · Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres · doi:10.1007/s11084-015-9428-3 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Serpentinization, abiogenic organic compounds, and deep life
Wang, X., Ouyang, Z., Zhuo, S., Zhang, M., Zheng, G., & Wang, Y. (2014) · Science China Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11430-014-4821-8 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- MCCOLLOM, T. M., & AMEND, J. P.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- MCCOLLOM, T. M.
- Venue
- Geobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-144
- ISSN
- 1472-4669 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-4677
- OpenAlex
- W1968096801
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geobiology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › thermodynamics and calorimetric analyses
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Keywords
- biomass synthesis, energy flow, oxic and anoxic conditions, submarine hydrothermal systems, microbial productivity, geothermal environments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review