The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Copper amendment of agricultural soil selects for bacterial antibiotic resistance in the field
Abstract
AIMS: The objective of this study was to determine whether Cu-amendment of field plots affects the frequency of Cu resistance, and antibiotic resistance patterns in indigenous soil bacteria. METHODS AND RESULTS: Soil bacteria were isolated from untreated and Cu-amended field plots. Cu-amendment significantly increased the frequency of Cu-resistant isolates. A panel of isolates were characterized by Gram-reaction, amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis and resistance profiling against seven antibiotics. More than 95% of the Cu-resistant isolates were Gram-negative. Cu-resistant Gram-negative isolates had significantly higher incidence of resistance to ampicillin, sulphanilamide and multiple (> or =3) antibiotics than Cu-sensitive Gram-negative isolates. Furthermore, Cu-resistant Gram-negative isolates from Cu-contaminated plots had significantly higher incidence of resistance to chloramphenicol and multiple (> or =2) antibiotics than corresponding isolates from control plots. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results of this field experiment show that introduction of Cu to agricultural soil selects for Cu resistance, but also indirectly selects for antibiotic resistance in the Cu-resistant bacteria. Hence, the widespread accumulation of Cu in agricultural soils worldwide could have a significant effect on the environmental selection of antibiotic resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seiler, C., & Berendonk, T. U. (2012) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00399 · Cited by 1,018
Imran, M., Das, K. R., & Naik, M. M. (2019) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.114 · Cited by 597
Hu, H.-W., Wang, J.-T., Li, J., Shi, X.-Z., Ma, Y.-B., Chen, D., & He, J.-Z. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b03383 · Cited by 312
Song, J., Rensing, C., Holm, P. E., Virta, M., & Brandt, K. K. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b05342 · Cited by 200
Heavy Metal Induced Antibiotic Resistance in Bacterium LSJC7
Chen, S., Li, X., Sun, G., Zhang, Y., Su, J., & Ye, J. (2015) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms161023390 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Berg, J., Tom-Petersen, A., & Nybroe, O.
- Venue
- Letters in Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 146-151
- ISSN
- 0266-8254 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2673
- OpenAlex
- W2087317601
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Copper amendment of agricultural soil selects for bacterial antibiotic resistance in the field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01650.x
- The paper
- Berg, J., Tom-Petersen, A., & Nybroe, O. (2005). Copper amendment of agricultural soil selects for bacterial antibiotic resistance in the field. Letters in Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2004.01650.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.