The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial spoilage of wine and approaches to minimize it
Abstract
Bacteria are part of the natural microbial ecosystem of wine and play an important role in winemaking by reducing wine acidity and contributing to aroma and flavour. Conversely, they can cause numerous unwelcome wine spoilage problems, which reduce wine quality and value. Lactic acid bacteria, especially Oenococcus oeni, contribute positively to wine sensory characters, but other species, such as Lactobacillus sp. and Pediococcus sp can produce undesirable volatile compounds. Consequences of bacterial wine spoilage include mousy taint, bitterness, geranium notes, volatile acidity, oily and slimy-texture, and overt buttery characters. Management of wine spoilage bacteria can be as simple as manipulating wine acidity or adding sulfur dioxide. However, to control the more recalcitrant bacteria, several other technologies can be explored including pulsed electric fields, ultrahigh pressure, ultrasound or UV irradiation, and natural products, including bacteriocins and lysozyme.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour
SWIEGERS, J. H., BARTOWSKY, E. J., HENSCHKE, P. A., & PRETORIUS, I. S. (2005) · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x · Cited by 1,216
Self-citationMannitol production by lactic acid bacteria: a review
Wisselink, H. W., Weusthuis, R. A., Eggink, G., Hugenholtz, J., & Grobben, G. J. (2002) · International Dairy Journal · doi:10.1016/s0958-6946(01)00153-4 · Cited by 396
The ‘buttery’ attribute of wine—diacetyl—desirability, spoilage and beyond
Bartowsky, E. J., & Henschke, P. A. (2004) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.05.013 · Cited by 370
Self-citationCostello, P. J., & Henschke, P. A. (2002) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf020341r · Cited by 112
Effect of wine type on the detection threshold for diacetyl
Martineau, B., Acree, T. E., & Henick-Kling, T. (1995) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/0963-9969(95)90797-e · Cited by 108
Action of Dimethyldicarbonate on Various Yeasts
Daudt, C. E., & Ough, C. S. (1980) · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture · doi:10.5344/ajev.1980.31.1.21 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Santos, M. C., Nunes, C., Saraiva, J. A., & Coimbra, M. A. (2012) · European Food Research and Technology · doi:10.1007/s00217-011-1614-6 · Cited by 184
Growth inhibitory effect of grape phenolics against wine spoilage yeasts and acetic acid bacteria
Pastorkova, E., Zakova, T., Landa, P., Novakova, J., Vadlejch, J., & Kokoska, L. (2013) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.12.018 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Bartowsky, E. J.
- Venue
- Letters in Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-156
- ISSN
- 0266-8254 (ISSN-L)
- 1472-765X
- OpenAlex
- W2021346306
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 14.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial spoilage of wine and approaches to minimize it. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2008.02505.x
- The paper
- Bartowsky, E. J. (2009). Bacterial spoilage of wine and approaches to minimize it. Letters in Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765x.2008.02505.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.