Bimatoprost 0.03% gel for cosmetic eyelash growth and enhancement
Abstract
Summary: Objective To evaluate a bimatoprost gel for enhancing eyelash growth, adverse effects, and change in intraocular pressure (IOP). Methods Prospective, double‐masked, randomized controlled study. Fifty‐two patients without ocular disease were assigned a control or bimatoprost 0.03% gel to apply to the eyelid margin once a day. Results The adjusted mean change in eyelash length from baseline to 6 months was 0.77 mm in the bimatoprost group and −0.12 mm in the control group (P = 0.004). Adverse effects were experienced by 2 of 16 patients (12.5%) in the control group and 9 of 36 patients (25%) in the bimatoprost gel group. Mean change in IOP from baseline to 6 months was 0.685 mmHg in the control group and −2.04 mmHg in the bimatoprost group (P = 0.009). Conclusions Bimatoprost gel was effective in enhancing eyelash growth. The most common adverse effect for the bimatoprost gel was conjunctival and eyelid hyperemia, while the most severe was recurrent anterior uveitis. Mean IOP was reduced in subjects using the bimatoprost gel.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bimatoprost 0.03% has enhanced eyelash prominence in clinical trials enrolling mostly Caucasian subjects.
“Bimatoprost 0.03 % has enhanced eyelash prominence in clinical trials enrolling mostly Caucasian subjects.”
From Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
The types of adverse events reported in the current trials were consistent with those of prior studies investigating mostly Caucasian populations with hypotrichosis of the eyelashes.
“The types of AEs reported in the current trials were consistent with those of prior studies investigating mostly Caucasian populations with hypotrichosis of the eyelashes [15, 17].”
From Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies (2014) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Brandt, J. D., VanDenburgh, A. M., Chen, K., & Whitcup, S. M. (2001) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00584-x · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bimatoprost for Eyelash Growth in Japanese Subjects: Two Multicenter Controlled Studies
Harii, K., Arase, S., Tsuboi, R., Weng, E., Daniels, S., & VanDenburgh, A. (2014) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-014-0293-7 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Woodward, J. A., Haggerty, C. J., Stinnett, S. S., & Williams, Z. Y.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- ORCID
- Stinnett, Sandra S
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-102
- ISSN
- 1473-2130 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-2165
- OpenAlex
- W2170423164
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Research to Prevent Blindness
- Allergan
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
- Keywords
- bimatoprost, eyelash growth, intraocular pressure, adverse effects, conjunctival hyperemia, anterior uveitis, prostamide
- MeSH terms
- Bimatoprost, Adult, Aged, Amides, Cloprostenol, Double-Blind Method, Eyelashes, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review