The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Language testing: the social dimension
Abstract
In this book, the authors foreground an aspect of language testing that is usually not much discussed and is frequently considered an “advanced” topic: the social dimension of language testing. They see various social dimensions in language testing. There are socially oriented language tests, i.e., tests which assess learners’ ability to use language in social settings. These are primarily oral proficiency interviews and tests of second language pragmatics. But the authors also understand “social” as “societal” and look at the larger‐scale impact of tests on individual learners or groups of learners by discussing fairness and bias in language testing. They also broaden their view and discuss the role of language testing in a macro‐social context, e.g. as accountability measures in education systems, as gatekeeping instruments for migration, and as tools for constructing and defining social groups. Their discussion is anchored in traditional and more recent views of validity theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address
Goffman, E. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095141 · Cited by 2,782
Brennan, R. L. (2001) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-3456-0 · Cited by 1,121
An argument-based approach to validity.
Kane, M. T. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.527 · Cited by 901
Focus Article: On the Structure of Educational Assessments
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003) · Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective · doi:10.1207/s15366359mea0101_02 · Cited by 802
Current Concerns in Validity Theory
Kane, M. T. (2001) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x · Cited by 748
Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment
Bachman, L. F. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667350 · Cited by 568
The No Child Left Behind Act and English Language Learners: Assessment and Accountability Issues
Abedi, J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033001004 · Cited by 517
Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk
Golato, A. (2003) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/24.1.90 · Cited by 498
Building and Supporting a Case for Test Use
Bachman, L. F. (2005) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1207/s15434311laq0201_1 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532208090158 · Cited by 355
Emergent bilingual students in secondary school: Along the academic language and literacy continuum
Menken, K. (2013) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444813000281 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Roever, C., & McNamara, T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Applied Linguistics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-23
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 242-258
- ISSN
- 0802-6106 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-4192
- OpenAlex
- W2136945725
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 142.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Language testing: the social dimension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00117.x
- The paper
- Roever, C., & McNamara, T. (2006). Language testing: the social dimension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00117.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.