The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drosophila lifespan control by dietary restriction independent of insulin‐like signaling
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Reduced insulin/insulin‐like growth factor (IGF) signaling may be a natural way for the reduction of dietary nutrients to extend lifespan. While evidence challenging this hypothesis is accumulating with Caenorhabditis elegans, for Drosophila melanogaster it is still thought that insulin/IGF and the mechanisms of dietary restriction (DR) might as yet function through overlapping mechanisms. Here, we aim to understand this potential overlap. We found that over‐expression of dFOXO in head fat body extends lifespan and reduces steady‐state mRNA abundance of insulin‐like peptide‐2 under conditions of high dietary yeast, but not when yeast is limiting. In contrast, conditions of DR that increase lifespan change only insulin‐like peptide‐5 (ilp5) mRNA abundance. Thus, reduction of ilp5 mRNA is associated with longevity extension by DR, while reduction of insulin‐like peptide‐2 is associated with the diet‐dependent effects of FOXO over‐expression upon lifespan. To assess whether reduction of ilp5 is required for DR to extend lifespan, we blocked its diet‐dependent change with RNAi. Loss of the ilp5 dietary response did not diminish the capacity of DR to extend lifespan. Finally, we assessed the capacity of DR to extend lifespan in the absence of dFOXO, the insulin/IGF‐responsive transcription factor. As with the knockdown of ilp5 diet responsiveness, DR was equally effective among genotypes with and without dFOXO. It is clear from many Drosophila studies that insulin/IGF mediates growth and metabolic responses to nutrition, but we now find no evidence that this endocrine system mediates the interaction between dietary yeast and longevity extension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Extending the Lifespan of Long-Lived Mice
Bartke, A., Wright, J. C., Mattison, J. A., Ingram, D. K., Miller, R. A., & Roth, G. S. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35106646 · Cited by 422 · cited 1×
“Because DR extends lifespan to the same extent in Ames and wild-type mice, it is thought that the mechanisms of Ames longevity assurance are independent of those induced by restricted diet (Bartke et al., 2001).”
BackgroundBuch, S., Melcher, C., Bauer, M., Katzenberger, J., & Pankratz, M. J. (2008) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2008.02.012 · Cited by 179
Self-citation
Cited by
Extending Healthy Life Span—From Yeast to Humans
Fontana, L., Partridge, L., & Longo, V. D. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172539 · Cited by 3,023
Ristow, M., & Zarse, K. (2010) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2010.03.014 · Cited by 789
Extending life span by increasing oxidative stress
Ristow, M., & Schmeisser, S. (2011) · Free Radical Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.010 · Cited by 722
Long live FOXO : unraveling the role of FOXO proteins in aging and longevity
Martins, R., Lithgow, G. J., & Link, W. (2016) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/acel.12427 · Cited by 720
Greer, E. L., & Brunet, A. (2009) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00459.x · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- Min, K., Yamamoto, R., Buch, S., Pankratz, M., & Tatar, M.
- Venue
- Aging Cell
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-206
- ISSN
- 1474-9718 (ISSN-L)
- 1474-9726
- OpenAlex
- W2071206597
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drosophila lifespan control by dietary restriction independent of insulin‐like signaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00373.x
- The paper
- Min, K., Yamamoto, R., Buch, S., Pankratz, M., & Tatar, M. (2008). Drosophila lifespan control by dietary restriction independent of insulin‐like signaling. Aging Cell. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00373.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.