The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Re‐Appraisal of the Fertility Response to the Australian Baby Bonus
Open accessAbstract
The Australian baby bonus offering parents $3,000 on the birth of a new child was announced on 11 May 2004. The availability of five years of birth data following the introduction of the baby bonus allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the policy implications than is current in the literature. The focus of this paper is to identify if there is a positive fertility choice response to the introduction of the Australian baby bonus policy and if this response is sustained over time. To do this, 19 years of birth and macroeconomic data, beginning in 1990, is analysed using an unobservable components model. The results indicate a significant increase in birth numbers ten months following the announcement of the baby bonus, and this overall increase was sustained up to the end of the observed period. A cumulative growth in birth numbers which commenced in January 2006 slows in 2008 and 2009. It is suggested that the initial increase in births, identified in March 2005, is a direct fertility response to the introduction of the policy, and that the subsequent change in the growth of birth numbers may be the result of a delayed effect working through a number of channels. We estimate that approximately 108,000 births are attributable to the baby bonus over the period, at an approximate cost of $43,000 per extra child.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The amount in a baby bonus package can never fully offset the lifetime direct and indirect costs of raising a child (Malak, Rahman, and Yip 2019; Chuard and Chuard-Keller 2021; Sinclair, Boymal, and de Silva 2012).”
From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Sinclair, Boymal, and de Silva 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2010, 2009/10 Year Book Australia
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2010, Births, Australia
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2011, Australian Demographic Statistics
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2011, Australian National Accounts
- Becker G.S., 1960, An Economic Analysis of Fertility. Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries
- Becker G.S., 2003, Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment
- Drago R., 2010, Population Research and Policy Review, 381
- Durlauf S., 1999, Social Interaction and Fertility Transitions’, Working Papers 28
- Gans J.S.andLeigh A.(2007) ‘Born (Again) on the First of July: Another Experiment in Birth Timing’ The Selected Works of Joshua S Gans. [Cited 20 March 2012.] Available from:http://works.bepress.com/joshuagans/15. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/0032472031000150066 · DOI · Paper page
- Gray M., 2008, Fertility and Family Policy in Australia
- Harvey A.C., 1990, The Econometric Analysis of Time Series
- Harvey A.C., 1991, Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter
- 10.2307/2298122 · DOI
- Kohler H.‐P.(1997) ‘Fertility and Social Interaction: An Economic Approach(Dissertation)’ Department of Economics University of California Berkeley CA.
- Koopman S.J. Harvey A.C. Doornik J.A.andShephard N.(2006) Structural Time Series Analysis Modelling and Prediction Using STAMP. 7.Timberlake Consultants Press London.
- 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02382.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01126.x · DOI
- 10.1136/jech.2009.100347 · DOI
- Leibenstein H., 1957, Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth
- 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00094.x · DOI
- McDonald P., 2005, ‘Has the Australian Fertility Rate Stopped Falling?’, People and Place, 13, 1
- 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00001.x · DOI
- 10.1162/0034653054638382 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2007.00395.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adda, J., Dustmann, C., & Stevens, K. (2017) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/690952 · Cited by 467
Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections
Gauthier, A. H., & Gietel‐Basten, S. (2025) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/padr.12691 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- SINCLAIR, S., BOYMAL, J., & DE SILVA, A.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- SINCLAIR, SARAH
- Venue
- Economic Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 78-87
- ISSN
- 0013-0249 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-4932
- OpenAlex
- W1919906623
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Economic Record (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- baby bonus, fertility response, birth rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review