Cited by 25Social Policies and FamilyGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Re‐Appraisal of the Fertility Response to the Australian Baby Bonus

Open access

Abstract

The Australian baby bonus offering parents $3,000 on the birth of a new child was announced on 11 May 2004. The availability of five years of birth data following the introduction of the baby bonus allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the policy implications than is current in the literature. The focus of this paper is to identify if there is a positive fertility choice response to the introduction of the Australian baby bonus policy and if this response is sustained over time. To do this, 19 years of birth and macroeconomic data, beginning in 1990, is analysed using an unobservable components model. The results indicate a significant increase in birth numbers ten months following the announcement of the baby bonus, and this overall increase was sustained up to the end of the observed period. A cumulative growth in birth numbers which commenced in January 2006 slows in 2008 and 2009. It is suggested that the initial increase in births, identified in March 2005, is a direct fertility response to the introduction of the policy, and that the subsequent change in the growth of birth numbers may be the result of a delayed effect working through a number of channels. We estimate that approximately 108,000 births are attributable to the baby bonus over the period, at an approximate cost of $43,000 per extra child.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2012.00805.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2010, 2009/10 Year Book Australia
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2010, Births, Australia
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2011, Australian Demographic Statistics
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), 2011, Australian National Accounts
  5. Becker G.S., 1960, An Economic Analysis of Fertility. Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries
  6. Becker G.S., 2003, Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment
  7. Drago R., 2010, Population Research and Policy Review, 381
  8. Durlauf S., 1999, Social Interaction and Fertility Transitions’, Working Papers 28
  9. Gans J.S.andLeigh A.(2007) ‘Born (Again) on the First of July: Another Experiment in Birth Timing’ The Selected Works of Joshua S Gans. [Cited 20 March 2012.] Available from:http://works.bepress.com/joshuagans/15. · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.07.004 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/0032472031000150066 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gray M., 2008, Fertility and Family Policy in Australia
  13. Harvey A.C., 1990, The Econometric Analysis of Time Series
  14. Harvey A.C., 1991, Forecasting, Structural Time Series Models and the Kalman Filter
  15. 10.2307/2298122 · DOI
  16. Kohler H.‐P.(1997) ‘Fertility and Social Interaction: An Economic Approach(Dissertation)’ Department of Economics University of California Berkeley CA.
  17. Koopman S.J. Harvey A.C. Doornik J.A.andShephard N.(2006) Structural Time Series Analysis Modelling and Prediction Using STAMP. 7.Timberlake Consultants Press London.
  18. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02382.x · DOI
  19. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01126.x · DOI
  20. 10.1136/jech.2009.100347 · DOI
  21. Leibenstein H., 1957, Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth
  22. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00094.x · DOI
  23. McDonald P., 2005, ‘Has the Australian Fertility Rate Stopped Falling?’, People and Place, 13, 1
  24. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2001.00001.x · DOI
  25. 10.1162/0034653054638382 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2007.00395.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
SINCLAIR, S., BOYMAL, J., & DE SILVA, A.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
SINCLAIR, SARAH
Venue
Economic Record
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06
Volume
88
Issue
s1
Pages
78-87
ISSN
  • 0013-0249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-4932
OpenAlex
W1919906623
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economic Record (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
baby bonus, fertility response, birth rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review