Cited by 458Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsSocial Policies and FamilyFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Family Benefits and Fertility: An Econometric Analysis

Gauthier, Anne Hélène, Hatzius, Jan·1997·Population Studies

Abstract

quality of life of families, either financially or by allowing parents to combine more easily employment and family responsibilities. But while such policies have been welcomed by the electorate, we know very little about their actual effect. Few studies have evaluated the impact of these policies on the quality of life of families, and even fewer have evaluated their impact on the demographic

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0032472031000150066

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauthier, A. H., & Hatzius, J.
Venue
Population Studies
Published
1997-11
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
295-306
ISSN
  • 0032-4728 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4747
OpenAlex
W1967552699
Cited by
458
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
10.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Population Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Policies and Family
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
family allowances, fertility, family policy, quality of life, work-family balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review