The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global energy dilemmas: a geographical perspective
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between global energy security and climate change policy. There are growing concerns about the sustainability of the future supply of hydrocarbons. The energy system is the single largest source of anthropogenic greenhouse gases, therefore it is no surprise that decarbonising the supply of energy services is a key element of climate change policy. The central proposition of this paper is that the world faces a global energy dilemma: can we have secure, reliable and affordable supplies of energy and, at the same time, manage the transition to a low‐carbon energy system? The paper is divided into five sections. The first section considers the contemporary challenges to global energy security, focusing on the possibility that in the future oil production might not be able to meet demand. The second section considers how the perils of climate change are forcing us to rethink the very meaning of energy security such that a low‐carbon energy revolution is now called for. The third section explains that while the developed world is largely responsible for the anthropogenic carbon emissions currently in the atmosphere, a global shift in energy demand is underway and over the next 20 years it is the developing world that will contribute an ever‐increasing share of global emissions. The fourth section introduces the notion of the global energy dilemma nexus to explain how the processes of globalisation are the driving force behind this global shift in energy demand and carbon emissions. The final section explains how the global energy dilemma nexus plays itself out in different ways across the globe. The conclusions suggest that human geography can make a significant contribution to social science research on energy security and climate change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Harvey, D. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199264315.001.0001 · Cited by 7,037
Oil in parallax: Scarcity, markets, and the financialization of accumulation
Labban, M. (2010) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.12.002 · Cited by 149
Cited by
Challenges and opportunities in improving the production of bio-ethanol
Baeyens, J., Kang, Q., Appels, L., Dewil, R., Lv, Y., & Tan, T. (2015) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2014.10.003 · Cited by 567
Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change
Rutherford, J., & Coutard, O. (2014) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098013500090 · Cited by 435
Assessing energy security: An overview of commonly used methodologies
Månsson, A., Johansson, B., & Nilsson, L. J. (2014) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.073 · Cited by 272
Of embodied emissions and inequality: Rethinking energy consumption
Baker, L. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.027 · Cited by 50
Methodologies for characterising and valuing energy security — A short critical review
Mansson, A., Johansson, B., & Nilsson, L. J. (2012) · 2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market · doi:10.1109/eem.2012.6254752 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- BRADSHAW, M. J.
- Venue
- The Geographical Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-11-05
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 275-290
- ISSN
- 0016-7398 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-4959
- OpenAlex
- W2140567917
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 50.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global energy dilemmas: a geographical perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00375.x
- The paper
- BRADSHAW, M. J. (2010). Global energy dilemmas: a geographical perspective. The Geographical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00375.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.