The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The everywhere war
Abstract
Much of the discussion of 9/11 has debated its historical significance, but it is equally important to explore the geographical dimensions of the wars that have been conducted in its shadows. Subsequent transformations in the American way of war have played a major role in the increased militarisation of the planet. Most attention has been focused on Afghanistan and Iraq as the principal theatres of the ‘war on terror’, but one of the characteristics of late modern war is the emergent, ‘event-ful’ quality of military, paramilitary and terrorist violence that can, in principle, occur anywhere. Vulnerabilities are differentially distributed but widely dispersed, and in consequence late modern war is being changed by the slippery spaces through which it is conducted. This paper explores three global borderlands to bring those changes into focus: Afghanistan–Pakistan (particularly the deployment of CIA-controlled drones in Pakistan), US–Mexico (particularly the expansion of Mexico's ‘drug war’ and the US militarisation of the border), and cyberspace (particularly the role of stealth attacks on critical infrastructure and the formation of US Cyber Command).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borderlands/La frontera: the new mestiza
Anzaldúa, G. (2017) · Censored · doi:10.1515/9780773551886-027 · Cited by 10,736
Mbembe, A. (2003) · Public Culture · doi:10.1215/08992363-15-1-11 · Cited by 5,841
Stone, B. E. (2004) · Foucault Studies · doi:10.22439/fs.v0i1.567 · Cited by 1,126
Stuxnet and the Future of Cyber War
Farwell, J. P., & Rohozinski, R. (2011) · Survival · doi:10.1080/00396338.2011.555586 · Cited by 945
The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq
Tilly, C. (2005) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.1538-165x.2005.tb01325.x · Cited by 889
Cities Under Siege: The New Military Urbanism
Graham, S. (2011) · doi:10.25405/ncl.34696731 · Cited by 877
Gregory, D. (2004) · Cited by 750
Self-citationFrom a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War
Gregory, D. (2011) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276411423027 · Cited by 508
Self-citationAfflicted Powers: Capital and Spectacle in a New Age of War
Boal, I., Clark, T., Matthews, J. G., et al. (2005) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 330
Lynn, W. F. (2010) · Foreign Affairs · Cited by 306
Cited by
Intimate infrastructures: The rubrics of gendered safety and urban violence in Kerala, India.
Datta, A., & Ahmed, N. (2020) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.01.016 · Cited by 107
Assembling Israeli drone warfare: Loitering surveillance and operational sustainability
Borg, S. (2021) · Security Dialogue · doi:10.1177/0967010620956796 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- GREGORY, D.
- Venue
- The Geographical Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-24
- Volume
- 177
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 238-250
- ISSN
- 0016-7398 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116201667
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 54.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The everywhere war. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00426.x
- The paper
- GREGORY, D. (2011). The everywhere war. The Geographical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00426.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.