The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War
Abstract
The proponents of late modern war like to argue that it has become surgical, sensitive and scrupulous, and remotely operated Unmanned Aerial Vehicles or ‘drones’ have become diagnostic instruments in contemporary debates over the conjunction of virtual and ‘virtuous’ war. Advocates for the use of Predators and Reapers in counterinsurgency and counterterrorism campaigns have emphasized their crucial role in providing intelligence, reconnaissance and surveillance, in strengthening the legal armature of targeting, and in conducting precision-strikes. Critics claim that their use reduces late modern war to a video game in which killing becomes casual. Most discussion has focused on the covert campaign waged by CIA-operated drones in Pakistan, but it is also vitally important to interrogate the role of United States Air Force-operated drones in Afghanistan. In doing so, it becomes possible to see that the problem there may not be remoteness and detachment but, rather, the sense of proximity to ground troops inculcated by the video feeds from the aerial platforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination
Smith, D. E., & Gordon, A. F. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2653923 · Cited by 4,341
War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception
Koppes, C. R., Virilio, P., & Camiller, P. (1991) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3105749 · Cited by 1,153
On Killing: the psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society*
Grossman, D. (2018) · The Political Self · doi:10.4324/9780429482762-7 · Cited by 893
Jay, M. (1988) · Cited by 443
Dillon, M., & Reid, J. (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203882542 · Cited by 363
Cloning terror: the war of images, 9/11 to the present
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-7193 · Cited by 313
Gregory, D. (2010) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00381.x · Cited by 157
Self-citationOn killing. II: The psychological cost of learning to kill.
Grossman, D. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 113
Bauman, Z. (2001) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/13684310122224966 · Cited by 104
The cubicle warrior: the marionette of digitalized warfare
Royakkers, L. M. M., & van Est, R. (2010) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9240-8 · Cited by 61
Cited by
GREGORY, D. (2011) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00426.x · Cited by 414
Self-citationScreen Trauma: Visual Media and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Pinchevski, A. (2016) · Theory, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/0263276415619220 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Gregory, D.
- Venue
- Theory, Culture & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 188-215
- ISSN
- 0263-2764 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3616
- OpenAlex
- W2159682605
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 124.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0263276411423027
- The paper
- Gregory, D. (2011). From a View to a Kill: Drones and Late Modern War. Theory, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411423027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.