Origins and biomechanical evolution of teeth in echinoids and their relatives
Abstract
Abstract: Echinoid teeth are without doubt the most complex and highly specialized skeletal component to have evolved in echinoderms. They are biomechanically constructed to be resilient and tough while maintaining a self‐sharpening point. Based on SEM analysis of isolated tooth elements collected primarily from the Ordovician and Silurian of Gotland, we provide a detailed structural analysis of the earliest echinoderm teeth. Eight distinct constructional designs are recognized encompassing various degrees of sophistication, from a simple vertical battery of tooth spines to advanced teeth with multiple tooth plate series and a reinforced core of fibres. These provide key data from which we reconstruct the early stages of tooth evolution. The simplest teeth are composed of stacked rod‐like elements with solid calcite tips. More advanced teeth underwent continuous replacement of tooth elements, as a simple self‐sharpening mechanism. Within echinoids tooth design was refined by evolving thinner, flatter primary plates with buttressing, allowing maintenance of a sharper and stronger biting edge. Despite the obvious homology between the lanterns of ophiocistioids and echinoids, their teeth are very different in microstructural organization, and they have evolved different self‐sharpening mechanisms. Whereas echinoid teeth evolved from a biseries of mouth spines, ophiocistioid goniodonts evolved from a single series of mouth spines. Rogeriserra represents the most primitive known battery of tooth elements but its taxonomic affinities remain unknown.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reciprocal feedbacks between prey and their defence structures (e.g. in arthropods and echinoderms) and either group of competing jawed predators (and increasing efficiency of both locomotory structures and jaws) appear quite likely.
“Reciprocal feedbacks between prey and their defence structures, e.g . in arthropods and echinoderms (see for example Reich & Smith 2009) and either group of competing jawed predators (and increasing efficiency of both locomotory structures and jaws), appear quite likely ( cf . Vermeij 1987, 1994, 2013; Brett & Walker 2002).”
From Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts (2017) · cites this paper as Reich & Smith 2009
Cites
Tooth structure and phylogeny of the Upper Permian echinoid<i>Miocidaris keyserlingi</i>
Smith, A. B., & Hollingworth, N. T. J. (1990) · Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society · doi:10.1144/pygs.48.1.47 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Palaeozoic evolution of animal mouthparts
Klug, C., Frey, L., Pohle, A., De Baets, K., & Korn, D. (2017) · Bulletin of Geosciences · doi:10.3140/bull.geosci.1648 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- REICH, M., & SMITH, A. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Göttingen (DE)
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- Corresponding author
- REICH, MIKE
- SMITH, ANDREW B.
- ORCID
- REICH, MIKE
- Venue
- Palaeontology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1149-1168
- ISSN
- 0031-0239 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-4983
- OpenAlex
- W2011382542
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Palaeontology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- dental evolution, Echinodermata, lanterns, tooth microstructure, calcite, tooth replacement, Ordovician, Silurian, Gotland, biomechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review