The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we argue for an approach that goes beyond an institutional reading of urban climate governance to engage with the ways in which government is accomplished through social and technical practices. Central to the exercise of government in this manner, we argue, are ‘climate change experiments’– purposive interventions in urban socio‐technical systems designed to respond to the imperatives of mitigating and adapting to climate change in the city. Drawing on three different concepts – of governance experiments, socio‐technical experiments, and strategic experiments – we first develop a framework for understanding the nature and dynamics of urban climate change experiments. We use this conceptual analysis to frame a scoping study of the global dimensions of urban climate change experimentation in a database of 627 urban climate change experiments in 100 global cities. The analysis charts when and where these experiments occur, the relationship between the social and technical aspects of experimentation and the governance of urban climate change experimentation, including the actors involved in their governing and the extent to which new political spaces for experimentation are emerging in the contemporary city. We find that experiments serve to create new forms of political space within the city, as public and private authority blur, and are primarily enacted through forms of technical intervention in infrastructure networks, drawing attention to the importance of such sites in urban climate politics. These findings point to an emerging research agenda on urban climate change experiments that needs to engage with the diversity of experimentation in different urban contexts, how they are conducted in practice and their impacts and implications for urban governance and urban life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geels, F. W. (2002) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8 · Cited by 7,275
Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701419121 · Cited by 1,777
Cited by
Anguelovski, I., Shi, L., Chu, E., Gallagher, D., Goh, K., Lamb, Z., Reeve, K., & Teicher, H. (2016) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x16645166 · Cited by 668
Transition towards Circular Economy in the Food System
Jurgilevich, A., Birge, T., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Pietikäinen, J., Saikku, L., & Schösler, H. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8010069 · Cited by 607
The urban south and the predicament of global sustainability
Nagendra, H., Bai, X., Brondizio, E. S., & Lwasa, S. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0101-5 · Cited by 564
Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., Kaboli, A., & Alahi, A. (2024) · Environmental Science and Ecotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2023.100330 · Cited by 536
Bulkeley, H., Edwards, G. A. S., & Fuller, S. (2014) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.009 · Cited by 455
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-375
- ISSN
- 0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-5661
- OpenAlex
- W1482339355
- Cited by
- 1,197
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
- The paper
- Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.