The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework For The Analysis of European Election Results
Abstract
The composition of the directly elected European Parliament does not precisely reflect the “real” balance of political forces in the European Community. As long as the national political systems decide most of what there is to be decided politically, and everything really important, European elections are additional national second-order elections. They are determined more by the domestic political cleavages than by alternatives originating in the EC, but in a different way than if nine first-order national elections took place simultaneously. This is the case because European elections occur at different stages of the national political systems' respective “electoral cycles”. Such a relationship between a second-order arena and the chief arena of a political system is not at all unusual. What is new here, is that one second-order political arena is related to nine different first-order arenas. A first analysis of European election results satisfactorily justifies the assumption that European Parliament direct elections should be treated as nine simultaneous national second-order elections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eulau, H. (1960) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305540012235x · Cited by 4,722
(1970) · Cited by 3,618
The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws
Groennings, S., & Rae, D. W. (1968) · The Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.2307/446528 · Cited by 1,766
Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups.
Matthews, D. R., & Key, V. O. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088925 · Cited by 965
Elections and the Political Order
Poggi, G., Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1967) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/588599 · Cited by 698
Elections and The Political Order.
Wildavsky, A., Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091822 · Cited by 419
Elections and The Political Order.
Seeley, J. R., Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091821 · Cited by 267
Cited by
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781108595841 · Cited by 2,986
The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent
Hobolt, S. B. (2016) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785 · Cited by 1,156
Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections
Cancela, J., & Geys, B. (2016) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005 · Cited by 452
Bright, J. (2018) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmx002 · Cited by 207
What Affects Voter Turnout? A Review Article/Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Research
Stockemer, D. (2017) · Government and Opposition · doi:10.1017/gov.2016.30 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Reif, K., & Schmitt, H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Political Research
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1980-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-44
- ISSN
- 0304-4130 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-6765
- OpenAlex
- W1966989238
- Cited by
- 2,750
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 23.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework For The Analysis of European Election Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
- The paper
- Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework For The Analysis of European Election Results. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.