Cited by 102Survey Methodology and NonresponseHealth and Medical StudiesHealth Education and Validation

Comparison of Web‐Based versus Paper‐and‐Pencil Self‐Administered Questionnaire: Effects on Health Indicators in Dutch Adolescents

Open access
Van De Looij‐Jansen, Petra M., De Wilde, Erik Jan·2008·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study is to investigate differences in responses related to (mental) health and behavior between two methods of data collection: web‐based (web) and paper‐and‐pencil (p&p). Study Design. Within each participating school all third‐grade classes (mainly 14–15‐year‐old pupils) were randomly assigned to either the Internet condition (n=271) or the paper‐and‐pencil condition (n=261). Principal Findings. Significant but small differences were found for the strengths and difficulties subscales “emotional symptoms” (p&p>web) and “prosocial behavior” (p&p>web), and carrying a weapon (web>p&p). Perceived level of privacy and confidentiality did not differ between the two modes. Conclusions. The findings suggest that in a controlled school setting, web‐based administration of health indicators yields almost the same results as paper‐and‐pencil administration. To generalize these findings, we recommend repeated studies in other populations and settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00860.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internet-based interventions have not been shown to prevent suicidal behavior, and only 3 of 10 studies reported benefit for suicidal ideation.

    “Internet-based interventions have not been shown to prevent suicidal behavior (Table S5) but are highly scalable. Only 3/10 studies reported benefit for suicidal ideation(117–123) (Table S5).”

    From Improving Suicide Prevention Through Evidence-Based Strategies: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as [123]

    The Methods section, “Measures (Mental) Health and Problem Behavior” (page unavailable), says the study asked adolescents about suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. The Abstract (page unavailable) describes a comparison of web-based and paper questionnaires, not an intervention. Searches for intervention effects and the claimed 3-of-10 result found no passage addressing either claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cohen, J. 1988. In Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavior Sciences (Revised Edition). New York: Academic.
  2. Rothman, K. J., and S. Greenland. 1998. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott- Raven Publishers.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van De Looij‐Jansen, P. M., & De Wilde, E. J.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-09-20
Volume
43
Issue
5p1
Pages
1708-1721
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W1559302404
Cited by
102
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
web-based questionnaire, paper-and-pencil questionnaires, self-administered questionnaire, mode of data collection, adolescent mental health, emotional symptoms, prosocial behavior, weapon carrying, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Confidentiality, Data Collection, Female, Health Status, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Netherlands, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Health Behavior, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review