Cited by 400Community Health and DevelopmentEthics in Clinical ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Systematic Review of Community‐Based Participatory Research to Enhance Clinical Trials in Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups

Open access
De Las Nueces, Denise, Hacker, Karen, DiGirolamo, Ann, Hicks, LeRoi S.·2012·Health Services Research

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of current community‐based participatory research (CBPR) clinical trials involving racial and ethnic minorities. Data Source: All published peer‐reviewed CBPR intervention articles in PubMed and CINAHL databases from January 2003 to May 2010. Study Design: We performed a systematic literature review. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: Data were extracted on each study's characteristics, community involvement in research, subject recruitment and retention, and intervention effects. Principle Findings: We found 19 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 were published from 2007 to 2010. Articles described some measures of community participation in research with great variability. Although CBPR trials examined a wide range of behavioral and clinical outcomes, such trials had very high success rates in recruiting and retaining minority participants and achieving significant intervention effects. Conclusions: Significant publication gaps remain between CBPR and other interventional research methods. CBPR may be effective in increasing participation of racial and ethnic minority subjects in research and may be a powerful tool in testing the generalizability of effective interventions among these populations. CBPR holds promise as an approach that may contribute greatly to the study of health care delivery to disadvantaged populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01386.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wallerstein N., 2008, Community‐Based Participatory Research for Health: from Process to Outcomes, 371

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–399 of 399

Metadata

Authors
De Las Nueces, D., Hacker, K., DiGirolamo, A., & Hicks, L. S.
Affiliations
  • Office of Diversity and Community Partnership Harvard Medical School Boston MA
  • Cambridge Health Alliance (US)
  • CARE USA (US)
  • UMass Memorial Health Care (US)
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-02-21
Volume
47
Issue
3pt2
Pages
1363-1386
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W2107954772
Cited by
400
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
community-based participatory research, racial and ethnic minorities, clinical trials, minority participation in research, participant recruitment, participant retention, community-engaged research, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Ethnicity, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Research Design, Health Behavior, Racial Groups, Community-Based Participatory Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review