The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Information Content of Forward‐Looking Statements in Corporate Filings—A Naïve Bayesian Machine Learning Approach
Abstract
This paper examines the information content of the forward‐looking statements (FLS) in the Management Discussion and Analysis section (MD&A) of 10‐K and 10‐Q filings using a Naïve Bayesian machine learning algorithm. I find that firms with better current performance, lower accruals, smaller size, lower market‐to‐book ratio, less return volatility, lower MD&A Fog index, and longer history tend to have more positive FLSs. The average tone of the FLS is positively associated with future earnings even after controlling for other determinants of future performance. The results also show that, despite increased regulations aimed at strengthening MD&A disclosures, there is no systematic change in the information content of MD&As over time. In addition, the tone in MD&As seems to mitigate the mispricing of accruals. When managers “warn” about the future performance implications of accruals (i.e., the MD&A tone is positive (negative) when accruals are negative (positive)), accruals are not associated with future returns. The tone measures based on three commonly used dictionaries (Diction, General Inquirer, and the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) do not positively predict future performance. This result suggests that these dictionaries might not work well for analyzing corporate filings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foundations of statistical natural language processing
Manning, C. D., & Schütze, H. (1999) · Cited by 9,816
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0 · Cited by 8,097
An algorithm for suffix stripping
Porter, M. F. (1980) · Program · doi:10.1108/eb046814 · Cited by 8,096
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1985) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,838
Verrecchia, R. E. (1983) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/0165-4101(83)90011-3 · Cited by 3,481
Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital.
Botosan, C. A. (1997) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-9709240185 · Cited by 3,436
Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence
Li, F. (2008) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003 · Cited by 2,838
Self-citationAdaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour
Bellman, R. E. (1961) · doi:10.1515/9781400874668 · Cited by 2,802
The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications
Geisser, S. (1975) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1975.10479865 · Cited by 2,748
Cross-Sectional Determinants of Analyst Ratings of Corporate Disclosures
Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2491273 · Cited by 2,637
Cited by
The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature
Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. R. (2010) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003 · Cited by 2,609
LEUZ, C., & WYSOCKI, P. D. (2016) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12115 · Cited by 1,760
Gentzkow, M., Kelly, B., & Taddy, M. (2019) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20181020 · Cited by 1,236
Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review
Blankespoor, E., deHaan, E., & Marinovic, I. (2020) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101344 · Cited by 1,076
The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filings
Campbell, J. L., Chen, H., Dhaliwal, D. S., Lu, H.-M., & Steele, L. B. (2014) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-013-9258-3 · Cited by 923
Metadata
- Authors
- LI, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-13
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1049-1102
- ISSN
- 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-679X
- OpenAlex
- W2162256707
- Cited by
- 1,360
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 92.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Information Content of Forward‐Looking Statements in Corporate Filings—A Naïve Bayesian Machine Learning Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2010.00382.x
- The paper
- LI, F. (2010). The Information Content of Forward‐Looking Statements in Corporate Filings—A Naïve Bayesian Machine Learning Approach. Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2010.00382.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.