The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investor Information Demand: Evidence from Google Searches Around Earnings Announcements
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study is to investigate factors that influence investor information demand around earnings announcements and to provide insights into how variation in information demand impacts the capital market response to earnings. The Internet is one channel through which public information is disseminated to investors and we propose that one way that investors express their demand for public information is via Google searches. We find that abnormal Google search increases about two weeks prior to the earnings announcement, spikes markedly at the announcement, and continues at high levels for a period after the announcement. This finding suggests that information diffusion is not instantaneous with the release of the earnings information, but rather is spread over a period surrounding the announcement. We also find that information demand is positively associated with media attention and news, and is negatively associated with investor distraction. When investors search for more information in the days just prior to the announcement, preannouncement price and volume changes reflect more of the upcoming earnings news and there is less of a price and volume response when the news is announced. This result suggests that, when investors demand more information about a firm, the information content of the earnings announcement is partially preempted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets
Stiglitz, J. E., & Grossman, S. J. (1980) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8765r99 · Cited by 3,645
The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure
Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2672910 · Cited by 2,370
Cited by
Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review
Blankespoor, E., deHaan, E., & Marinovic, I. (2020) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101344 · Cited by 1,076
Sweeney, L. (2013) · Queue · doi:10.1145/2460276.2460278 · Cited by 477
Why Don't We Agree? Evidence from a Social Network of Investors
COOKSON, J. A., & NIESSNER, M. (2020) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12852 · Cited by 386
Hou, T. C. (2019) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1647 · Cited by 290
Internet searching and stock price crash risk: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
Xu, Y., Xuan, Y., & Zheng, G. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.03.003 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- DRAKE, M. S., ROULSTONE, D. T., & THORNOCK, J. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Accounting Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-04-11
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1001-1040
- ISSN
- 0021-8456 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-679X
- OpenAlex
- W3123103903
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Investor Information Demand: Evidence from Google Searches Around Earnings Announcements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00443.x
- The paper
- DRAKE, M. S., ROULSTONE, D. T., & THORNOCK, J. R. (2012). Investor Information Demand: Evidence from Google Searches Around Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00443.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.