CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 212Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early exposure to violence, domestic violence, attachment representations, and marital adjustment

GODBOUT, NATACHA, DUTTON, DONALD G., LUSSIER, YVAN, SABOURIN, STÉPHANE·2009·Personal Relationships
DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01228.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present study investigates the effects of violent experiences in childhood on current domestic violence and marital adjustment, using adult attachment theory as a conceptual framework. A nonclinical sample of 644 Canadian adults in long‐term romantic relationships completed measures of adult romantic attachment, conflict tactics scales, and dyadic adjustment. Structural equation modeling revealed that early experiences of violence affect adults' intimate violence directly and indirectly through anxiety over abandonment and avoidance of intimacy. The actor–partner interdependence model illustrated the importance of early exposure to violence in predicting both partners' attachment representations, intimate violence, and couple adjustment. Findings are discussed with reference to the clinical issues surrounding minor violence against the intimate partner.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01228.x

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bartholomew K., 1993, Understanding relationship processes 2: Learning about relationships, 30
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bowlby J., 1973, Attachment and loss
  4. Byrne B. M., 2006, Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, application, and programming
  5. 10.1891/vv-v21i6a005 · DOI
  6. Greenfeld L. A., 1998, Violence by intimate: Analysis of data on crimes by current or former spouses, boyfriends, and girlfriends
  7. 10.1037/0022-006X.65.1.68 · DOI
  8. 10.2466/PR0.84.3.1251-1252 · DOI
  9. Ramsay J. O., 1995, TESTGRAF: A program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice test and questionnaire data
  10. Satorra A., 1988, ASA proceedings, business and economic statistics section, 308

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 212

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
GODBOUT, N., DUTTON, D. G., LUSSIER, Y., & SABOURIN, S.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
LUSSIER, YVAN
ORCID
Venue
Personal Relationships
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
365-384
ISSN
  • 1350-4126 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6811
DOI
10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01228.x
OpenAlex
W2043110898
Cited by
212
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 29 d)
Locations
Personal Relationships (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
domestic violence, marital adjustment, adult attachment theory, attachment representations, intimate partner violence, conflict tactics, actor-partner interdependence, couple adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review