Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

THE EFFECTS OF A SERIES OF ω‐PHOSPHONIC α‐CARBOXYLIC AMINO ACIDS ON ELECTRICALLY EVOKED AND EXCITANT AMINO ACID‐INDUCED RESPONSES IN ISOLATED SPINAL CORD PREPARATIONS

Open access
EVANS, R.H., FRANCIS, A.A., JONES, A.W., SMITH, D.A.S., WATKINS, J.C.·1982·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

The depressant actions on evoked electrical activity and the excitant amino acid antagonist properties of a range of ω‐phosphonic α‐carboxylic amino acids have been investigated in the isolated spinal cord preparations of the frog or immature rat. When tested on dorsal root‐evoked ventral root potentials, members of the homologous series from 2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovaleric acid to 2‐amino‐8‐phosphonooctanoic acid showed depressant actions which correlated with the ability of the substances to antagonize selectively motoneuronal depolarizations induced by N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate. 2‐Amino‐5‐phosphonovalerate was the most potent substance of the series giving an apparent KD of 1.4 μ m for the antagonism of responses to N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate. A comparison of the (+)‐ and (—)‐forms of 2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovalerate indicated that the N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate antagonist activity and the neuronal depressant action of this substance were both due mainly to the (—)‐isomer. The (—)‐ and (+)‐forms of 2‐amino‐4‐phosphonobutyrate had different actions. The (—)‐form of this substance had a relatively weak and non‐selective antagonist action on depolarizations induced by N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate, quisqualate and kainate and a similarly weak depressant effect when tested on evoked electrical activity. The (+)‐form was more potent than the (—)‐form in depressing electrically evoked activity but did not antagonize responses to amino acid excitants. At concentrations higher than those required to depress electrically evoked activity, the (+)‐form produced depolarization. This action was blocked by 2‐amino‐5‐phosphonovalerate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb08758.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
EVANS, R. H., FRANCIS, A. A., JONES, A. W., SMITH, D. A. S., & WATKINS, J. C.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-01
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
65-75
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W1975317646
Cited by
467
References
0
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EFFECTS OF A SERIES OF ω‐PHOSPHONIC α‐CARBOXYLIC AMINO ACIDS ON ELECTRICALLY EVOKED AND EXCITANT AMINO ACID‐INDUCED RESPONSES IN ISOLATED SPINAL CORD PREPARATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb08758.x
The paper
EVANS, R. H., FRANCIS, A. A., JONES, A. W., SMITH, D. A. S., & WATKINS, J. C. (1982). THE EFFECTS OF A SERIES OF ω‐PHOSPHONIC α‐CARBOXYLIC AMINO ACIDS ON ELECTRICALLY EVOKED AND EXCITANT AMINO ACID‐INDUCED RESPONSES IN ISOLATED SPINAL CORD PREPARATIONS. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb08758.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.