Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

SPECTRUM OF THE μ‐, δ‐ AND κ‐BINDING SITES IN HOMOGENATES OF RAT BRAIN

Open access
GILLAN, M.G.C., KOSTERLITZ, H.W.·1982·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

In homogenates of rat brain, the binding characteristics of tritiated opiates and opioid peptides were examined and the relative capacities of μ‐, δ‐ and κ‐binding sites of the opiate receptor determined by saturation analysis. In competition experiments, binding of the selective μ‐ligand [3 H]‐[d‐Ala 2,MePhe 4,Gly‐ol 5]enkephalin at the μ‐site was displaced by [d‐Ala 2,d‐Leu 5]enkephalin with rather low affinity (KI= 12.6 n m) and more readily by the ketazocine‐like compounds (−)‐ethylketazocine (KI= 3.1 n m) and (−)‐bremazocine (KI= 0.32 n m), which also displaced the binding of [3 H]‐[d‐Ala 2,d‐Leu 5]enkephalin from the δ‐site. In contrast, the binding to the κ‐site was easily displaced by ethylketazocine (1.0 n m) and bremazocine (0.37 n m) but not by the μ‐ligand [d‐Ala 2,MePhe 4,Gly‐ol 5]enkephalin (KI= 2000–3000 n m) or the δ‐ligand [d‐Ala 2,d‐Leu 5]enkephalin (KI> 20,000 n m). The dissociation equilibrium constant (KD) and the binding capacity (pmol/g) of the μ‐binding site were determined with the selective μ‐ligand [3 H]‐[d‐Ala 2,MePhe 4,Gly‐ol 5]enkephalin. For the δ‐site, [3 H]‐[d‐Ala 2,d‐Leu 5]enkephalin was used in the presence of unlabelled [d‐Ala 2,MePhe 4,Gly‐ol 5]enkephalin in order to suppress cross‐reactivity to the μ‐binding site. For the estimation of κ‐binding, [3 H]‐(±)‐ethylketazocine or [3 H]‐(−)‐bremazocine were used in the presence of unlabelled μ‐ and δ‐ligands for the suppression of cross‐reactivities to the μ‐ and δ‐binding sites. In rat brain the capacity of the μ‐binding site was 7.3 pmol/g brain, that of the δ‐binding site 6.7 pmol/g brain and that of the κ‐binding site 2.0 pmol/g brain. Thus, the κ‐binding site had the lowest value whereas in the guinea‐pig brain the capacity of the μ‐binding site was lower than that of the δ‐ or κ‐binding site.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb09319.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
GILLAN, M. G. C., & KOSTERLITZ, H. W.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1982-11
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
461-469
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2092526105
Cited by
279
References
0
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SPECTRUM OF THE μ‐, δ‐ AND κ‐BINDING SITES IN HOMOGENATES OF RAT BRAIN. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb09319.x
The paper
GILLAN, M. G. C., & KOSTERLITZ, H. W. (1982). SPECTRUM OF THE μ‐, δ‐ AND κ‐BINDING SITES IN HOMOGENATES OF RAT BRAIN. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb09319.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.