The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies on the antinociceptive action of α‐agonist drugs and their interactions with opioid mechanisms
Open accessAbstract
A modified abdominal constriction test, whereby the drugs used are injected intraperitoneally when the writhing response is maximal, has been used to study the antinociceptive activity of various sympathomimetic drugs. Of those tested, clonidine was the most potent, with an ID 50 value in the nanomolar range. (—)‐Isoprenaline, (—)‐adrenaline and (—)‐noradrenaline were only a little less potent. Phenylephrine, the least potent, had only about one‐sixtieth of the activity of clonidine. The antinociceptive action appears to occur within the peritoneum, since it was apparent almost immediately after the drugs were injected and was produced by doses far smaller than were effective by the subcutaneous route. α‐Adrenoceptors appear to be involved in the reaction, since noradrenaline showed stereos‐pecificity, and the α‐adrenoceptor antagonists phentolamine and piperoxan both shifted the dose‐response curves of the α‐adrenoceptor agonist drugs to the right, usually parallel to the control curves. The high antinociceptive potency of clonidine and oxymetazoline, indicate the importance of α 2‐adrenoceptors and this was supported by the finding that piperoxan was a more effective antagonist than phentolamine. The moderate potency of phenylephrine suggests that α 1‐adrenoceptors may also be involved, although the selective α 1‐antagonist, prazosin, did not antagonize noradrenaline and had antinociceptive activity of its own. β‐Adrenoceptors also appear to be involved in the antinociceptive response, since propranalol antagonized the effect of isoprenaline, but not that of clonidine. Piperoxan was a very effective antagonist of morphine, while phentolamine had a weaker action. Naloxone had little action against the α‐adrenoceptor agonists. Mice pretreated with clonidine or oxymetazoline but not noradrenaline showed a very great cross‐tolerance to morphine. Morphine pretreatment caused marked desensitization of itself, but little cross‐tolerance to clonidine or oxymetazoline. It is suggested that sensory nerves in the mouse peritoneum have α 2‐ and β‐adrenoceptors on their terminals, and possibly α 1‐receptors also. It is possible that when activated by the appropriate agonists they depress the generation of pain impulses. There is an interaction between the α‐adrenoceptors and opioid receptors in the mouse peritoneum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ethnopharmacologic investigation of ginger (Zingiber officinale)
Mascolo, N., Jain, R., Jain, S. C., & Capasso, F. (1989) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/0378-8741(89)90085-8 · Cited by 323
Anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive activity of the water decoction Desmodium gangeticum
Rathi, A., Rao, C. V., Ravishankar, B., De, S., & Mehrotra, S. (2004) · Journal of Ethnopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.jep.2004.07.009 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Bentley, G. A., Newton, S. H., & Starr, J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-05
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-134
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W2010248759
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies on the antinociceptive action of α‐agonist drugs and their interactions with opioid mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb10504.x
- The paper
- Bentley, G. A., Newton, S. H., & Starr, J. (1983). Studies on the antinociceptive action of α‐agonist drugs and their interactions with opioid mechanisms. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb10504.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.