Cited by 424Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

7‐Nitro indazole, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, exhibits anti‐nociceptive activity in the mouse without increasing blood pressure

Open access
Moore, P.K., Babbedge, R.C., Wallace, P., Gaffen, Z.A., Hart, S.L.·1993·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

7‐Nitro indazole (7‐NI) inhibits mouse cerebellar nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in vitro with an IC 50 of 0.47 μ m. Following i.p. administration in mice, 7‐NI (10–50 mg kg−1) produces dose‐related anti‐nociception as evidenced by an inhibition of late phase (15–30 min) but not early phase (0–5 min) hindpaw licking time following subplantar injection of formalin (10 μl, 5% v/v). The ED 50 for this effect was 26 mg kg−1 (equivalent to 159.5 μmol kg−1). Similar i.p. administration of 7‐NI (20 and 80 mg kg−1) in urethane‐anaesthetized mice failed to increase MAP. Thus, 7‐NI is a novel inhibitor of NOS which exhibits selectivity for the brain enzyme. Accordingly, 7‐NI may be a useful starting point for the development of selective, centrally acting NOS inhibitors devoid of cardiovascular side effects and as a tool to study the central pharmacological effects of nitric oxide (NO).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb12798.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Moore, P. K., Babbedge, R. C., Wallace, P., Gaffen, Z. A., & Hart, S. L.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Moore, P.K.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-02
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
296-297
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W2007727357
Cited by
424
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
21.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
7-nitroindazole, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, antinociception, formalin test, blood pressure, central nervous system, nitric oxide, analgesia
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Oxidoreductases, Analgesics, Animals, Blood Pressure, Cerebellum, Formaldehyde, Indazoles, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Sensitivity and Specificity, Nitric Oxide Synthase, Mice, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review