Cited by 125Diabetes Treatment and ManagementAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor stimulation as a means of neuroprotection

Open access
Harkavyi, Alexander, Whitton, Peter S.·2010·British Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) is a relatively recently discovered molecule originating in the so‐called L‐cells of the intestine. The peptide has insulinotrophic properties and it is this characteristic that has predominantly been investigated. This has led to the use of the GLP‐1‐like peptide exendin‐4 (EX‐4), which has a much longer plasma half‐life than GLP‐1 itself, being used in the treatment of type II diabetes. The mode of action of this effect appears to be a reduction in pancreatic apoptosis, an increase in beta cell proliferation or both. Thus, the effects of GLP‐1 receptor stimulation are not based upon insulin replacement but an apparent repair of the pancreas. Similar data suggest that the same effects may occur in other peripheral tissues. More recently, the roles of GLP‐1 and EX‐4 have been studied in nervous tissue. As in the periphery, both peptides appear to promote cellular growth and reduce apoptosis. In models of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and peripheral neuropathy, stimulation of the GLP‐1 receptor has proved to be highly beneficial. In the case of Parkinson's disease this effect is evident after the neurotoxic lesion is established, suggesting real potential for therapeutic use. In the present review we examine the current status of the GLP‐1 receptor and its potential as a therapeutic target.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00486.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harkavyi, A., & Whitton, P. S.
Corresponding author
Whitton, Peter S.
Venue
British Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
495-501
ISSN
  • 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5381
OpenAlex
W1753192434
Cited by
125
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Parkinson's UK (G-0807)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
glucagon-like peptide-1, GLP-1 receptor, exendin-4, neuroprotection, neurotrophic effects, apoptosis, beta-cell proliferation, type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, peripheral neuropathy, L cells
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Exenatide, Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Half-Life, Insulin, Intestines, Pancreas, Peptides, Venoms, Apoptosis, Receptors, Glucagon, Neuroprotective Agents, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review