Factors Affecting the Extent to which Consumers Incorporate Functional Ingredients into their Diets
Abstract
This study considers the factors that explain the consumption of food and beverages with functional ingredients to avert or offset health problems. We use an instrumental variables Poisson regression model to deal with the endogeneity of perceived health status in functional ingredient use. The first stage results indicate that perceived health status is associated with attitude towards functional foods, food consumption motives and information seeking and being female. The second stage results suggest that individuals who consume more functional ingredients tend to have a positive attitude towards functional foods, are novelty-seeking, female and older. As expected, consumption of functional ingredients is more likely when consumers’ self-reports indicate that they are aware of functional foods’ nutritional value and the link with their own health. Consistent with previous research, most of the socio-demographics are poor predictors of functional ingredient consumption.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Females are more likely to consume functional foods compared to males.
“In general, females are more likely to consume functional foods compared to males [25,26,27].”
From The association of demographic characteristics and food choice motives with the consumption of functional foods in emerging adults (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
The influence of demographic variables on attitudes toward and consumption of functional foods has been reported in several articles.
“The influence of demographic variables on attitudes toward and consumption of functional foods has been reported in several articles [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].”
From The association of demographic characteristics and food choice motives with the consumption of functional foods in emerging adults (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Cranfield, J., Henson, S., & Masakure, O.
- Affiliations
- Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Masakure, Oliver
- Venue
- Journal of Agricultural Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-15
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 375-392
- ISSN
- 0021-857X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114234769
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Agricultural Economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Keywords
- functional foods, functional food ingredients, consumer behavior, health perception, information seeking, novelty seeking, gender differences, age differences, nutrition awareness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review