Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Shooting the Archives: Document Digitization for Historical–Geographical Collaboration 1

Keeling, Arn, Sandlos, John·2011·History Compass

Abstract

This article focuses on the practical and methodological dimensions of a somewhat‐neglected aspect of so‐called ‘digital history’: user digitization of historical documents for research projects. Increasing numbers of professional researchers, including historians and historical geographers, are embracing digital technologies as a way to speed research, collect large amounts of primary source material, and enhance their use of this material by mobilizing it from its institutional context. Yet few scholars or information managers have reflected on the implications of this vast, decentralized and idiosyncratic digitization exercise. Debates over digital history have focused mainly on the role and place of archives in the digitization of historical sources or the collection and preservation of digitally created sources, or the merits of the application of new information technologies to historical research. In this short reflection on our own research process, we consider the trend towards self‐digitization of archival sources, and share our practical experiences of document digitization for research and collaborative purposes. We contend that practitioner document digitization opens up exciting new methods for reading and analysing documents, in particular possibilities for enhanced scholarly collaboration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2011.00771.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bateman K, 2005, Taking a Byte Out of the Archives: Making Technology Work for You, Perspectives on History, 43
  2. 10.2307/25095630 · DOI
  3. Cohen D. J., 2006, Digital History: A Guide to Gathering, Preserving and Presenting the Past on the Web
  4. 10.5210/fm.v12i11.2029 · DOI
  5. 10.1525/tph.2004.26.2.7 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/jhbs.10036 · DOI
  7. Grafton A, Future Reading: Digitization and its Discontents, The New Yorker
  8. 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00487.x · DOI
  9. Keeling A, 2000, Relics of the Past: A Methodological Inquiry into an Archival Source, Archives Association of British Columbia Newsletter, 10, 1
  10. Kurtz M, 2001, Situating Practices: The Archive and the File Cabinet, Historical Geography, 29, 26
  11. Lazenby Craig B, 2008, Old Myths in New Clothes: Expectations of Archives Users, Archivaria, 45, 118
  12. 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.09.001 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/9780470999875.ch5 · DOI

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Keeling, A., & Sandlos, J.
Venue
History Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
423-432
ISSN
1478-0542
Cited by
9
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shooting the Archives: Document Digitization for Historical–Geographical Collaboration 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2011.00771.x
The paper
Keeling, A., & Sandlos, J. (2011). Shooting the Archives: Document Digitization for Historical–Geographical Collaboration 1. History Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-0542.2011.00771.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.