The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preneoplastic lesions in human hepatocarcinogenesis
Abstract
Abstract: The early stages of hepatocarcinogenesis in human chronic liver diseases are characterized by the emergence of preneoplastic lesions of which some will eventually develop into hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Basic studies on the genetic and epigenetic alterations of these preneoplastic lesions may eventually lead to new therapeutic strategies. Clinicopathological studies are also important in order to determine optimal management of patients with a preneoplastic lesion. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current concepts of preneoplastic lesion in chronic liver diseases. The microscopical small‐cell dysplastic focus is the smallest morphologically recognizable precursor lesion of HCC and therefore is a logical target of study to elucidate the earliest events in hepatocarcinogenesis. In contrast, large‐cell dysplasia is not a precursor lesion, but appears to be of clinical value because of its good predictive value for development of HCC. Dysplastic nodules (DNs) are macroscopically recognizable precursor lesions of HCC and high‐grade DNs (HGDNs) have a risk of malignant transformation. Detection of DNs and correct differentiation from small HCC (<2 cm) is sometimes difficult, especially when only imaging techniques are used. Additional clinicopathological studies on identification and optimal treatment of DNs are necessary. Molecular studies on HGDNs and small HCCs may yield much information on the genetic mechanisms involved in the transition from severe dysplasia to early malignancy. In contrast, currently available data indicate that (large) regenerative nodules do not represent a distinct step in hepatocarcinogenesis. Animal models will be helpful in the further unravelling of human HCC development, provided that studies are performed on models that are good representatives of human hepatocarcinogenesis. We propose three criteria by which good mimickers can be identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calvisi, D. F., Factor, V. M., Ladu, S., Conner, E. A., & Thorgeirsson, S. S. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.02.014 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Nucleolus, Ribosomes, and Cancer
Montanaro, L., Treré, D., & Derenzini, M. (2008) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.2353/ajpath.2008.070752 · Cited by 451
Liver stem cells and their implication in hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma
Roskams, T. (2006) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209558 · Cited by 422
Self-citationSubramaniam, A., Shanmugam, M. K., Perumal, E., Li, F., Nachiyappan, A., Dai, X., Swamy, S. N., Ahn, K. S., Kumar, A. P., Tan, B. K. H., et al. (2013) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2012.10.002 · Cited by 278
Libbrecht, L., Severi, T., Cassiman, D., Borght, S. V., Pirenne, J., Nevens, F., Verslype, C., Pelt, J. V., & Roskams, T. (2006) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/01.pas.0000213323.97294.9a · Cited by 270
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Libbrecht, L., Desmet, V., & Roskams, T.
- Venue
- Liver International
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-27
- ISSN
- 0106-9543 (ISSN-L)
- 1478-3223
- 1478-3231
- OpenAlex
- W2170673833
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preneoplastic lesions in human hepatocarcinogenesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01016.x
- The paper
- Libbrecht, L., Desmet, V., & Roskams, T. (2005). Preneoplastic lesions in human hepatocarcinogenesis. Liver International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01016.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.