Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,402

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Edge Influence on Forest Structure and Composition in Fragmented Landscapes

HARPER, KAREN A., MACDONALD, S. ELLEN, BURTON, PHILIP J., CHEN, JIQUAN, BROSOFSKE, KIMBERLEY D., SAUNDERS, SARI C., EUSKIRCHEN, EUGÉNIE S., ROBERTS, DAR, JAITEH, MALANDING S., ESSEEN, PER‐ANDERS·2005·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Although forest edges have been studied extensively as an important consequence of fragmentation, a unifying theory of edge influence has yet to be developed. Our objective was to take steps toward the development of such a theory by (1) synthesizing the current knowledge of patterns of forest structure and composition at anthropogenically created forest edges, (2) developing hypotheses about the magnitude and distance of edge influence that consider the ecological processes influencing these patterns, and (3) identifying needs for future research. We compiled data from 44 published studies on edge influence on forest structure and composition in boreal, temperate, and tropical forests. Abiotic and biotic gradients near created forest edges generate a set of primary responses to edge creation. Indirect effects from these primary responses and the original edge gradient perpetuate edge influence, leading to secondary responses. Further changes in vegetation affect the edge environment, resulting in ongoing edge dynamics. We suggest that the magnitude and distance of edge influence are a direct function of the contrast in structure and composition between adjacent communities on either side of the edge. Local factors such as climate, edge characteristics, stand attributes, and biotic factors affect patch contrast. Regional factors define the context within which to assess the ecological significance of edge influence (the degree to which the edge habitat differs from interior forest habitat). Our hypotheses will help predict edge influence on structure and composition in forested ecosystems, an important consideration for conservation. For future research on forest edges in fragmented landscapes, we encourage the testing of our hypotheses, the use of standardized methodology, complete descriptions of study sites, studies on other types of edges, synthesis of edge influence on different components of the ecosystem, and investigations of edges in a landscape context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,402

Metadata

Authors
HARPER, K. A., MACDONALD, S. E., BURTON, P. J., CHEN, J., BROSOFSKE, K. D., SAUNDERS, S. C., EUSKIRCHEN, E. S., ROBERTS, D., JAITEH, M. S., & ESSEEN, P.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
768-782
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2099591330
Cited by
1,402
References
1
FWCI
33.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edge Influence on Forest Structure and Composition in Fragmented Landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x
The paper
HARPER, K. A., MACDONALD, S. E., BURTON, P. J., CHEN, J., BROSOFSKE, K. D., SAUNDERS, S. C., EUSKIRCHEN, E. S., ROBERTS, D., JAITEH, M. S., & ESSEEN, P. (2005). Edge Influence on Forest Structure and Composition in Fragmented Landscapes. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.