Cited by 1,042Forest Management and PolicyPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Forest health and global change

Trumbore, S., Brando, P., Hartmann, H.·2015·Science

Abstract

Humans rely on healthy forests to supply energy, building materials, and food and to provide services such as storing carbon, hosting biodiversity, and regulating climate. Defining forest health integrates utilitarian and ecosystem measures of forest condition and function, implemented across a range of spatial scales. Although native forests are adapted to some level of disturbance, all forests now face novel stresses in the form of climate change, air pollution, and invasive pests. Detecting how intensification of these stresses will affect the trajectory of forests is a major scientific challenge that requires developing systems to assess the health of global forests. It is particularly critical to identify thresholds for rapid forest decline, because it can take many decades for forests to restore the services that they provide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aac6759

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optimizing forest management strategies such as selection of suitable tree species, rotation length, and fertilization regimes are effective ways to increase forest C sequestration.

    “for C sequestration in forest ecosystems, optimizing forest management strategies such as selection of suitable tree species, rotation length, and fertilization regimes are effective ways to increase the amount of forest C sequestration.177, 178, 179”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [179]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trumbore, S., Brando, P., & Hartmann, H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Woodwell Climate Research Center (US)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE)
Corresponding author
Trumbore, S.
Venue
Science
Published
2015-08-21
Volume
349
Issue
6250
Pages
814-818
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1902238321
Cited by
1,042
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NSF (DEB-1146206)
  • Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
forest health, global change, climate change, air pollution, invasive pest, forest decline, ecological thresholds, forest carbon storage, biodiversity, forest services, forest restoration, forest condition assessment
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Stress, Physiological, Trees, Environmental Restoration and Remediation, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review