The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modern Insect Extinctions, the Neglected Majority
Abstract
Abstract: Most extinctions estimated to have occurred in the historical past, or predicted to occur in the future, are of insects. Despite this, the study of insect extinctions has been neglected. Only 70 modern insect extinctions have been documented, although thousands are estimated to have occurred. By focusing on some of the 70 documented extinctions as case studies, I considered ways in which insect extinctions may differ from those of other taxa. These case studies suggested that two types of extinction might be common for insects but rare for other taxa: extinction of narrow habitat specialists and coextinctions of affiliates with the extinctions of their hosts. Importantly, both of these forms of extinction are often ignored by conservation programs focused on vertebrates and plants. Anecdotal evidence and recent simulations suggest that many insect extinctions may have already occurred because of loss of narrow habitat specialists from restricted habitats and the loss of hosts. If we are serious about insect conservation, we need to spend more time and money documenting such extinctions. To neglect such extinctions is to ignore the majority of species that are or were in need of conservation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- 10.1007/s00442-003-1244-1 · DOI
- 10.2307/6025 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99193.x · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2000.99193.x · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00076-4 · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00076-4
- 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00253.x · DOI
- Dunn R. R., 2002, On parasites lost, Wild Earth Spring, 12, 13
- 10.1007/BF00695913 · doi:10.1007/bf00695913
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00880.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00880.x
- 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97196.x · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97196.x
- 10.1126/science.1060788 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.en.36.010191.002413 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x · DOI · Paper page
- Koh L. P., 2004, Co‐extinctions of tropical butterflies and their hostplants, Biotropica, 36, 272
- 10.1126/science.1101101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01945.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00021.x · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00021.x
- Liebherr J. K., 1997, Comparisons to the century before: the legacy of R. C. L. Perkins and Fauna Hawaiiensis as the basis for a long‐term ecological monitoring program, Pacific Science, 490
- 10.4039/Ent1211103-12 · doi:10.4039/ent1211103-12
- 10.1093/ee/19.5.1194 · DOI
- 10.1038/20436 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s002679910035 · doi:10.1007/s002679910035
- Mawdsley N. A., 1995, Insects in a changing environment, 321
- McCafferty W. P., 2001, Status of some historically unfamiliar American mayflies (Ephemeroptera), Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 77, 210
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97393.x · DOI
- Opler P. A., 1978, The American chestnut symposium, 83
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030376.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1016688529572 · doi:10.1023/a:1016688529572
- 10.1038/35002708 · DOI · Paper page
- Powell J. A., 1978, Endangered habitats for insects: California coastal sand dunes, Atala, 6, 41
- 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0948:PLDUTO]2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0948:plduto]2.0.co;2
- 10.1023/A:1023625710011 · DOI
- Redak R. A., 2000, Arthropods and multispecies habitat conservation plans: are we missing something, Environmental Management, 265, 97, 10.1007/s002670010065 · DOI
- Rentz D. C. F., 1977, A new and apparently extinct katydid from Antioch sand dunes, Entomological News, 88, 241
- Seal U. S., 1993, Conservation assessment and management plans (CAMPs) and global action plans (GAPs), Captive Breeding Specialists Group Newsletter, 4, 5
- Seow‐Choen F., 1997, Stick and leaf insect (Phasmida: Insecta) biodiversity in the nature reserves of Singapore. Proceedings of the Nature Reserves Survey Seminar, Gardens' Bulletin Singapore, 49, 297
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020338.x · DOI · Paper page
- Stork N. E., 1997, Biodiversity II, 41
- 10.1038/366307a0 · doi:10.1038/366307a0
- 10.1038/nature02121 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09010001.x · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09010001.x
- 10.1071/IT01032 · DOI
Cited by
Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers
Sánchez-Bayo, F., & Wyckhuys, K. A. G. (2019) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020 · Cited by 3,462
The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation?
Cowie, R. H., Bouchet, P., & Fontaine, B. (2022) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12816 · Cited by 874
“But even if extinction rates for insects are lower than those for mammals and birds by as much as an order of magnitude (Dunn, 2005; Stork, 2010), which the data above do not seem to support, this still seems unlikely to account for the tiny number listed as extinct on the Red List , which is more…”
Global dataset shows geography and life form predict modern plant extinction and rediscovery
Humphreys, A. M., Govaerts, R., Ficinski, S. Z., Nic Lughadha, E., & Vorontsova, M. S. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-019-0906-2 · Cited by 448
The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes
FOX, R. (2013) · Insect Conservation and Diversity · doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00186.x · Cited by 302
García-Robledo, C., Kuprewicz, E. K., Staines, C. L., Erwin, T. L., & Kress, W. J. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1507681113 · Cited by 306
Mass extinction in poorly known taxa
Régnier, C., Achaz, G., Lambert, A., Cowie, R. H., Bouchet, P., & Fontaine, B. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1502350112 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- DUNN, R. R.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-30
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1030-1036
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W1559000103
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.