Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mortality Gradients within and among Dominant Plant Populations as Barometers of Ecosystem Change During Extreme Drought

Open access
GITLIN, ALICYN R., STHULTZ, CHRISTOPHER M., BOWKER, MATTHEW A., STUMPF, STACY, PAXTON, KRISTINA L., KENNEDY, KARLA, MUÑOZ, AXHEL, BAILEY, JOSEPH K., WHITHAM, THOMAS G.·2006·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Understanding patterns of plant population mortality during extreme weather events is important to conservation planners because the frequency of such events is expected to increase, creating the need to integrate climatic uncertainty into management. Dominant plants provide habitat and ecosystem structure, so changes in their distribution can be expected to have cascading effects on entire communities. Observing areas that respond quickly to climate fluctuations provides foresight into future ecological changes and will help prioritize conservation efforts. We investigated patterns of mortality in six dominant plant species during a drought in the southwestern United States. We quantified population mortality for each species across its regional distribution and tested hypotheses to identify ecological stress gradients for each species. Our results revealed three major patterns: (1) dominant species from diverse habitat types (i.e., riparian, chaparral, and low‐ to high‐elevation forests) exhibited significant mortality, indicating that the effects of drought were widespread; (2) average mortality differed among dominant species (one‐seed juniper [Juniperus monosperma (Engelm.) Sarg.] 3.3%; manzanita [Arctostaphylos pungens Kunth], 14.6%; quaking aspen [Populus tremuloides Michx.], 15.4%; ponderosa pine [Pinus ponderosa P. & C. Lawson], 15.9%; Fremont cottonwood [Populus fremontii S. Wats.], 20.7%; and pinyon pine [Pinus edulis Engelm.], 41.4%); (3) all dominant species showed localized patterns of very high mortality (24–100%) consistent with water stress gradients. Land managers should plan for climatic uncertainty by promoting tree recruitment in rare habitat types, alleviating unnatural levels of competition on dominant plants, and conserving sites across water stress gradients. High‐stress sites, such as those we examined, have conservation value as barometers of change and because they may harbor genotypes that are adapted to climatic extremes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00424.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
GITLIN, A. R., STHULTZ, C. M., BOWKER, M. A., STUMPF, S., PAXTON, K. L., KENNEDY, K., MUÑOZ, A., BAILEY, J. K., & WHITHAM, T. G.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-30
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
1477-1486
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2155255038
Cited by
281
References
1
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality Gradients within and among Dominant Plant Populations as Barometers of Ecosystem Change During Extreme Drought. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00424.x
The paper
GITLIN, A. R., STHULTZ, C. M., BOWKER, M. A., STUMPF, S., PAXTON, K. L., KENNEDY, K., MUÑOZ, A., BAILEY, J. K., & WHITHAM, T. G. (2006). Mortality Gradients within and among Dominant Plant Populations as Barometers of Ecosystem Change During Extreme Drought. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00424.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.