The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salvage Logging, Ecosystem Processes, and Biodiversity Conservation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: We summarize the documented and potential impacts of salvage logging—a form of logging that removes trees and other biological material from sites after natural disturbance. Such operations may reduce or eliminate biological legacies, modify rare postdisturbance habitats, influence populations, alter community composition, impair natural vegetation recovery, facilitate the colonization of invasive species, alter soil properties and nutrient levels, increase erosion, modify hydrological regimes and aquatic ecosystems, and alter patterns of landscape heterogeneity. These impacts can be assigned to three broad and interrelated effects: (1) altered stand structural complexity; (2) altered ecosystem processes and functions; and (3) altered populations of species and community composition. Some impacts may be different from or additional to the effects of traditional logging that is not preceded by a large natural disturbance because the conditions before, during, and after salvage logging may differ from those that characterize traditional timber harvesting. The potential impacts of salvage logging often have been overlooked, partly because the processes of ecosystem recovery after natural disturbance are still poorly understood and partly because potential cumulative effects of natural and human disturbance have not been well documented. Ecologically informed policies regarding salvage logging are needed prior to major natural disturbances so that when they occur ad hoc and crisis‐mode decision making can be avoided. These policies should lead to salvage‐exemption zones and limits on the amounts of disturbance‐derived biological legacies (e.g., burned trees, logs) that are removed where salvage logging takes place. Finally, we believe new terminology is needed. The word salvage implies that something is being saved or recovered, whereas from an ecological perspective this is rarely the case.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecology of Coarse Woody Debris in Temperate Ecosystems
Harmon, M. E., Franklin, J. F., Swanson, F. J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S. V., Lattin, J. D., Anderson, N. H., Cline, S. P., Aumen, N. G., Sedell, J. R., et al. (1986) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60121-x · Cited by 3,749
Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities
Trombulak, S. C., & Frissell, C. A. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x · Cited by 1,898
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4491 · Cited by 1,177
Compounded Perturbations Yield Ecological Surprises
Paine, R. T., Tegner, M. J., & Johnson, E. A. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900049 · Cited by 1,063
Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach
(2003) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.40-2788 · Cited by 924
Influence of Forest Fires on the North Swedish Boreal Forest
Zackrisson, O. (1977) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3543289 · Cited by 817
Understanding Large River: Floodplain Ecosystems
Bayley, P. B. (1995) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1312554 · Cited by 789
Conserving Biodiversity in Managed Forests
Hansen, A. J., Spies, T. A., Swanson, F. J., & Ohmann, J. L. (1991) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1311745 · Cited by 696
Flammable Australia. The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent
Myerscough, P. (2003) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01317.x · Cited by 597
Flammable Australia: the fire regimes and biodiversity of a continent
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-6409 · Cited by 588
Cited by
A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation
Lindenmayer, D., Hobbs, R. J., Montague‐Drake, R., Alexandra, J., Bennett, A., Burgman, M., Cale, P., Calhoun, A., Cramer, V., Cullen, P., et al. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x · Cited by 746
Self-citationSignificant increase in natural disturbance impacts on European forests since 1950
Patacca, M., Lindner, M., Lucas‐Borja, M. E., Cordonnier, T., Fidej, G., Gardiner, B., Hauf, Y., Jasinevičius, G., Labonne, S., Linkevičius, E., et al. (2023) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16531 · Cited by 523
Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis
Mitchell, S. J. (2013) · Forestry · doi:10.1093/forestry/cps058 · Cited by 502
Fairman, T. A., Nitschke, C. R., & Bennett, L. T. (2016) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf15010 · Cited by 252
Driscoll, D. A., Lindenmayer, D. B., Bennett, A. F., Bode, M., Bradstock, R. A., Cary, G. J., Clarke, M. F., Dexter, N., Fensham, R., Friend, G., et al. (2010) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1755-263x.2010.00115.x · Cited by 91
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- LINDENMAYER, D. B., & NOSS, R. F.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-30
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 949-958
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2097945186
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Salvage Logging, Ecosystem Processes, and Biodiversity Conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00497.x
- The paper
- LINDENMAYER, D. B., & NOSS, R. F. (2006). Salvage Logging, Ecosystem Processes, and Biodiversity Conservation. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00497.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.