The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis
Abstract
Windthrow is all too often looked at as an exceptional, catastrophic phenomenon rather than a recurrent natural disturbance that falls within the spectrum of chronic and acute effects of wind on forests, and that drives ecosystem patterns and processes. This paper provides an integrative overview of the nature, contributing factors and impacts of wind-caused disturbance in forests, including its effects on trees, stands, landscapes and soils. Windthrow is examined through the integrating concepts of: the capacity of trees for acclimative growth, the limitation of acclimative growth under inter-tree competition, the recurrent nature of severe weather, how terrain and soil conditions affect local stand vulnerability and the effect of recurrent windthrow on stand dynamics and soils. Windthrow management should take place within a framework of general risk management, with evaluation of the likelihood, severity and potential impacts of wind damage considered – with reference to the broad and specific aims of management. There is much to be gained from interdisciplinary communication about the nature and consequences of recurrent wind damage. There are opportunities for climatologists, engineers, ecologists, geomorphologists and others to develop integrative process models at the tree, stand and landscape scales that will improve our collective understanding, and inform management decision-making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grime, J. P. (1977) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283244 · Cited by 5,754
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics.
Proctor, J., Pickett, S. T. A., & White, P. S. (1986) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2403105 · Cited by 3,949
The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-02952-3 · Cited by 2,121
OVERVIEW OF THE USE OF NATURAL VARIABILITY CONCEPTS IN MANAGING ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Landres, P. B., Morgan, P., & Swanson, F. J. (1999) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1179:ootuon]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,053
Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries
Schelhaas, M., Nabuurs, G., & Schuck, A. (2003) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00684.x · Cited by 1,044
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 933
Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind
Everham, E. M., & Brokaw, N. V. L. (1996) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02857920 · Cited by 744
Lindenmayer, D. B., Franklin, J. F., & Fischer, J. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.019 · Cited by 718
Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground
Anderson, R. C., & Walker, L. R. (2000) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3246595 · Cited by 663
PROCESS DOMAINS AND THE RIVER CONTINUUM 1
Montgomery, D. R. (1999) · JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03598.x · Cited by 660
Cited by
Ecological mitigation of hillslope instability: ten key issues facing researchers and practitioners
Stokes, A., Douglas, G. B., Fourcaud, T., Giadrossich, F., Gillies, C., Hubble, T., Kim, J. H., Loades, K. W., Mao, Z., McIvor, I. R., et al. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2044-6 · Cited by 398
Self-citationEmergent vulnerability to climate-driven disturbances in European forests
Forzieri, G., Girardello, M., Ceccherini, G., Spinoni, J., Feyen, L., Hartmann, H., Beck, P. S. A., Camps-Valls, G., Chirici, G., Mauri, A., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21399-7 · Cited by 373
Amazon windthrow disturbances are likely to increase with storm frequency under global warming
Feng, Y., Negrón-Juárez, R. I., Romps, D. M., & Chambers, J. Q. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35570-1 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Mitchell, S. J.
- Venue
- Forestry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-09-04
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-157
- ISSN
- 0015-752X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3626
- OpenAlex
- W2111065693
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/forestry/cps058
- The paper
- Mitchell, S. J. (2013). Wind as a natural disturbance agent in forests: a synthesis. Forestry. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cps058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.