Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 559

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Severity of the Effects of Invasive Rats on Seabirds: A Global Review

JONES, HOLLY P., TERSHY, BERNIE R., ZAVALETA, ERIKA S., CROLL, DONALD A., KEITT, BRADFORD S., FINKELSTEIN, MYRA E., HOWALD, GREGG R.·2008·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Abstract: Invasive rats are some of the largest contributors to seabird extinction and endangerment worldwide. We conducted a meta‐analysis of studies on seabird–rat interactions to examine which seabird phylogenetic, morphological, behavioral, and life history characteristics affect their susceptibility to invasive rats and to identify which rat species have had the largest impact on seabird mortality. We examined 94 manuscripts that demonstrated rat effects on seabirds. All studies combined resulted in 115 independent rat–seabird interactions on 61 islands or island chains with 75 species of seabirds in 10 families affected. Seabirds in the family Hydrobatidae and other small, burrow‐nesting seabirds were most affected by invasive rats. Laridae and other large, ground‐nesting seabirds were the least vulnerable to rats. Of the 3 species of invasive rats, Rattus rattus had the largest mean impact on seabirds followed by R. norvegicus and R. exulans; nevertheless, these differences were not statistically significant. Our findings should help managers and conservation practitioners prioritize selection of islands for rat eradication based on seabird life history traits, develop testable hypotheses for seabird response to rat eradication, provide justification for rat eradication campaigns, and identify suitable levels of response and prevention measures to rat invasion. Assessment of the effects of rats on seabirds can be improved by data derived from additional experimental studies, with emphasis on understudied seabird families such as Sulidae, Phalacrocoracidae, Spheniscidae, Fregatidae, Pelecanoididae, Phaethontidae, and Diomedeidae and evaluation of rat impacts in tropical regions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00859.x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

See all 559

Metadata

Authors
JONES, H. P., TERSHY, B. R., ZAVALETA, E. S., CROLL, D. A., KEITT, B. S., FINKELSTEIN, M. E., & HOWALD, G. R.
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
16-26
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W1899693996
Cited by
559
References
21
FWCI
28.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severity of the Effects of Invasive Rats on Seabirds: A Global Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00859.x
The paper
JONES, H. P., TERSHY, B. R., ZAVALETA, E. S., CROLL, D. A., KEITT, B. S., FINKELSTEIN, M. E., & HOWALD, G. R. (2008). Severity of the Effects of Invasive Rats on Seabirds: A Global Review. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00859.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.