Cited by 1,040Animal Ecology and Behavior StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationYersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research

The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat

Open access
Calhoun, John B.·1963

Abstract

Bibliography: p. 285-288

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5962/bhl.title.112283

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In natural settings, juvenile rats have access to many potential partners of both sexes, so they have choice with whom to play, unlike laboratory rats tested in pairs.

    “In the wild, as juvenile rats age, they would not only have access to their littermates, but also peers from nearby litters, and therefore many potential partners of both sexes (Calhoun 1963; Schweinfurth 2020). Thus, in natural settings, rats would have choice with whom to play, a choice that laboratory rats tested in pairs are not afforded.”

    From Partner Choice and Context‐Dependent Sex Differences in Rat Rough‐and‐Tumble Play (2026) · cites this paper as Calhoun 1963

    The burrow description (p. 18) reports young from a first litter sharing a burrow with a second litter, and another description reports five litters of varying ages in one burrow. These observations support access to peers beyond littermates in a naturalistic setting. Our copy does not establish that juveniles could choose play partners of both sexes or make the comparison with laboratory rats tested in pairs. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Low food availability promotes antagonistic in-group interactions between rodents, and the advantages of dominant position become more pronounced under limited resources conditions.

    “For example, data from naturalistic settings suggests that low food availability promote antagonistic in-group interactions between rodents-the advantages of dominant position become more pronounced under limited resources conditions.24,25”
  • Within wild rat groups, rats rarely fight with each other (but often attack intruders) and often sleep together in common burrows.

    “Within those groups, rats rarely fight with each other (but often attack intruders) and often sleep together in common burrows.25”
  • Rats that transfer from one collective to another are usually subordinates, do not play an active reproductive role, and often are unsuccessful in maintaining body weight.

    “Some rats transfer from one collective to another.These individuals, however, are usually subordinates.25 They do not play an active reproductive role, and often are unsuccessful in maintaining body weight (see Section 4).”
  • Factors that increase the probability of an animal becoming dominant are: longer residence on a given territory than a rival, being older and heavier, history of winning previous fights, and lack of stressful, traumatizing events.

    “Those are: longer residence on a given territory than a rival, being older and heavier, history of winning previous fights and lack of stressful, traumatizing events.25,50,76,92,104”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [6](6) Davis, D. E. : The role of intraspecific competition in game management. Trans. North Amer. Wildlife Conference 14: 225-231 (1949).
  2. [7](7) Wright, S.: In J. Huxley (Ed.), The New Systema- tics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1940, 161-183.
  3. [13](13) Calhoun, J. B.: Twenty-four hour periodicities in the animal kingdom. Part II. The vertebrates. J. Tennessee Academy Science 20: 228-231, 291-308, 373-378; 21 : 208-216, 281-282 (1945-46).
  4. [19](19) Bishop, F. C., Mitchell, J. D., and Parman, D. C.: Screw worms and other maggots affecting animals. U.S. Dept. Agric. Farmer's Bulletin, No. 857, 19 pp. (1922).
  5. [27](27) \j>vv.K7. t K. Z.: The comparative method in studing innate behavior patterns. Symposia of the Society i >r Experimental Biology, No. IV, Animal Behavior, pp. 221 268 (1950).
  6. [28](28) Davis, I). E.: The characteristics of rat populations. Quarterly Review of Biology 28: 373-401 (1953).
  7. [29](29) Barnett, S. A.: The biology of rat populations. Surgo, Candlemans, pp. 111-115 (1952).
  8. [31](31) Chitty, D., and Southern, H. N.: Control of rats and mice. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1954, Vol. 1 and 2, Rats, 532 p.; Vol. 3, Mice, 225 p.
  9. [32](32) Hirst, L. F.: The conquest of plague. A study of the evolution of epidemiology. Oxford University Press, 1953, 478 pp.
  10. [33](33) Castle, W. E.: The domestication of the rat. Proc. National Academy Science 33: 109-117 (1947).
  11. [38](38) Farris, E. J., and Griffith, J. Q.: The rat in lab- oratory investigation. Second edition Philadelphia, Pa., J. B. Lippincott Co., 1949, 542 pp.
  12. [41](41) Allee, W. C., Emerson, A., Park, O., Park, T., and Schmidt, K.: Principles of animal ecology. W. B. Saunders, 1949, 837 pp.
  13. [43](43) Stewart, J. Q. : Empirical mathematical rules con- cerning the distribution and equilibrium of popu- lation. Geographical Review 37: 461-485 (1947).
  14. [46](46) Parsons, T., and Shils, E. A. (Eds.): Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, Mass., Har- vard University Press, 1952, 506 pp.
  15. [48](48) Parsons, T.: The social system. Glencoe, 111., The Free Press, 1951, 575 pp.
  16. [49](49) Crawford, M. P.: The social psychology of the vertebrates. Psychological Bulletin 36: 407-446 (1939).
  17. [54](54) Rosvold, H. E., and Walker, A. M.: Effect of electroconvulsive shocks on nest building in the male albino rat. Proc. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 72: 270—272 (1949).
  18. [57](57) Rosvold, H. E., Kaplan, S. J., and Stevenson, J. A.: Effect of electroconvulsive shock on adrenal cortex of the rat. Proc. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 80: 60-62 (1952).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calhoun, J. B.
Corresponding author
Calhoun, John B.
Published
1963
OpenAlex
W2499413085
Cited by
1,040
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.26
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Michigan Library Repository (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research
Keywords
Rattus norvegicus, rodent ecology, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review