The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Invasion versus Isolation: Trade‐Offs in Managing Native Salmonids with Barriers to Upstream Movement
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: Conservation biologists often face the trade‐off that increasing connectivity in fragmented landscapes to reduce extinction risk of native species can foster invasion by non‐native species that enter via the corridors created, which can then increase extinction risk. This dilemma is acute for stream fishes, especially native salmonids, because their populations are frequently relegated to fragments of headwater habitat threatened by invasion from downstream by 3 cosmopolitan non‐native salmonids. Managers often block these upstream invasions with movement barriers, but isolation of native salmonids in small headwater streams can increase the threat of local extinction. We propose a conceptual framework to address this worldwide problem that focuses on 4 main questions. First, are populations of conservation value present (considering evolutionary legacies, ecological functions, and socioeconomic benefits as distinct values)? Second, are populations vulnerable to invasion and displacement by non‐native salmonids? Third, would these populations be threatened with local extinction if isolated with barriers? And, fourth, how should management be prioritized among multiple populations? We also developed a conceptual model of the joint trade‐off of invasion and isolation threats that considers the opportunities for managers to make strategic decisions. We illustrated use of this framework in an analysis of the invasion‐isolation trade‐off for native cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) in 2 contrasting basins in western North America where invasion and isolation are either present and strong or farther away and apparently weak. These cases demonstrate that decisions to install or remove barriers to conserve native salmonids are often complex and depend on conservation values, environmental context (which influences the threat of invasion and isolation), and additional socioeconomic factors. Explicit analysis with tools such as those we propose can help managers make sound decisions in such complex circumstances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J., & Melillo, J. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.494 · Cited by 9,086
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach
NOSS, R. F. (1990) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x · Cited by 3,151
Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders
Kolar, C. S., & Lodge, D. M. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02101-2 · Cited by 2,825
Ecological Resilience—In Theory and Application
Gunderson, L. H. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425 · Cited by 2,751
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities
Trombulak, S. C., & Frissell, C. A. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x · Cited by 1,898
Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system
Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23028 · Cited by 1,721
Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes
FAUSCH, K. D., TORGERSEN, C. E., BAXTER, C. V., & LI, H. W. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0483:ltrbtg]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,600
Self-citationThe problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines
Allendorf, F. W., Leary, R. F., Spruell, P., & Wenburg, J. K. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02290-x · Cited by 1,533
Global State of Biodiversity and Loss
Dirzo, R., & Raven, P. H. (2003) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105532 · Cited by 1,366
Cited by
Conservation biogeography of freshwater fishes: recent progress and future challenges
Olden, J. D., Kennard, M. J., Leprieur, F., Tedesco, P. A., Winemiller, K. O., & García‐Berthou, E. (2010) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00655.x · Cited by 403
Hydrological connectivity for riverine fish: measurement challenges and research opportunities
FULLERTON, A. H., BURNETT, K. M., STEEL, E. A., FLITCROFT, R. L., PESS, G. R., FEIST, B. E., TORGERSEN, C. E., MILLER, D. J., & SANDERSON, B. L. (2010) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02448.x · Cited by 379
Causes and consequences of habitat fragmentation in river networks
Fuller, M. R., Doyle, M. W., & Strayer, D. L. (2015) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12853 · Cited by 338
Isaak, D. J., Young, M. K., Nagel, D. E., Horan, D. L., & Groce, M. C. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12879 · Cited by 310
Self-citationCraig, L. S., Olden, J. D., Arthington, A. H., Entrekin, S., Hawkins, C. P., Kelly, J. J., Kennedy, T. A., Maitland, B. M., Rosi, E. J., Roy, A. H., et al. (2017) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.1525/elementa.256 · Cited by 154
Metadata
- Authors
- FAUSCH, K. D., RIEMAN, B. E., DUNHAM, J. B., YOUNG, M. K., & PETERSON, D. P.
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-13
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 859-870
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2072153913
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 19.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Invasion versus Isolation: Trade‐Offs in Managing Native Salmonids with Barriers to Upstream Movement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01159.x
- The paper
- FAUSCH, K. D., RIEMAN, B. E., DUNHAM, J. B., YOUNG, M. K., & PETERSON, D. P. (2009). Invasion versus Isolation: Trade‐Offs in Managing Native Salmonids with Barriers to Upstream Movement. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01159.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.