Cited by 42Animal Behavior and ReproductionWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Role of familiarity and preference in reproductive success in ex situ breeding programs

MARTIN, MEGHAN S., SHEPHERDSON, DAVID J.·2012·Conservation Biology

Abstract

Success of captive-breeding programs centers on consistent reproduction among captive animals. However, many individuals do not reproduce even when they are apparently healthy and presented with mates. Mate choice can affect multiple parameters of reproductive success, including mating success, offspring production, offspring survival, and offspring fecundity. We investigated the role of familiarity and preference on reproductive success of female Columbia Basin pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis) as measured by litter production, litter size, average number of young that emerged from the burrow, and average number of young that survived to 1 year. We conducted these studies on pygmy rabbits at the Oregon Zoo (Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.) and Washington State University (Pullman, Washington, U.S.A.) from February to June 2006, 2007, and 2008. Before mating, we housed each female adjacent to 2 males (neighbors). Female preference for each potential mate was determined on the basis of behavioral interactions observed and measured between the rabbits. We compared reproductive success between females mated with neighbor and non-neighbor males and between females mated with preferred and nonpreferred males. Our findings suggest that mating with a neighbor compared with a non-neighbor and mating with a preferred neighbor compared with a nonpreferred neighbor increased reproductive success in female pygmy rabbits. Litter production, average number of young that emerged, and average…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01880.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The positive influence of social familiarity on reproductive success has been shown for a variety of taxa.

    “The positive influence of social familiarity on reproductive success has been shown for a variety of taxa (Grabowska-Zhang et al., 2011; Martin and Shepherdson, 2012).”

    From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Martin and Shepherdson, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MARTIN, M. S., & SHEPHERDSON, D. J.
Affiliations
Oregon Zoo (US)
Venue
Conservation Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-19
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
649-656
ISSN
  • 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-1739
OpenAlex
W2156773474
Cited by
42
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Washington State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
mate choice, familiarity, reproductive success, captive breeding, ex situ conservation, Brachylagus idahoensis, litter size, offspring survival, social dynamics, threatened species, zoo animals, genetic diversity
MeSH terms
Animals, Breeding, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Fertility, Lagomorpha, Litter Size, Male, Recognition, Psychology, Mating Preference, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review