Role of familiarity and preference in reproductive success in ex situ breeding programs
Abstract
Success of captive-breeding programs centers on consistent reproduction among captive animals. However, many individuals do not reproduce even when they are apparently healthy and presented with mates. Mate choice can affect multiple parameters of reproductive success, including mating success, offspring production, offspring survival, and offspring fecundity. We investigated the role of familiarity and preference on reproductive success of female Columbia Basin pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis) as measured by litter production, litter size, average number of young that emerged from the burrow, and average number of young that survived to 1 year. We conducted these studies on pygmy rabbits at the Oregon Zoo (Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.) and Washington State University (Pullman, Washington, U.S.A.) from February to June 2006, 2007, and 2008. Before mating, we housed each female adjacent to 2 males (neighbors). Female preference for each potential mate was determined on the basis of behavioral interactions observed and measured between the rabbits. We compared reproductive success between females mated with neighbor and non-neighbor males and between females mated with preferred and nonpreferred males. Our findings suggest that mating with a neighbor compared with a non-neighbor and mating with a preferred neighbor compared with a nonpreferred neighbor increased reproductive success in female pygmy rabbits. Litter production, average number of young that emerged, and average…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The positive influence of social familiarity on reproductive success has been shown for a variety of taxa.
“The positive influence of social familiarity on reproductive success has been shown for a variety of taxa (Grabowska-Zhang et al., 2011; Martin and Shepherdson, 2012).”
From Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding (2016) · cites this paper as Martin and Shepherdson, 2012
Cites
Effects of environmental enrichment on reproduction
Carlstead, K., & Shepherdson, D. (1994) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.1430130507 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Husbandry and enclosure influences on penguin behavior and conservation breeding
Marshall, A. R., Deere, N. J., Little, H. A., Snipp, R., Goulder, J., & Mayer-Clarke, S. (2016) · Zoo Biology · doi:10.1002/zoo.21313 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- MARTIN, M. S., & SHEPHERDSON, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Oregon Zoo (US)
- Venue
- Conservation Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-19
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 649-656
- ISSN
- 0888-8892 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-1739
- OpenAlex
- W2156773474
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Washington State University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- mate choice, familiarity, reproductive success, captive breeding, ex situ conservation, Brachylagus idahoensis, litter size, offspring survival, social dynamics, threatened species, zoo animals, genetic diversity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Breeding, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Fertility, Lagomorpha, Litter Size, Male, Recognition, Psychology, Mating Preference, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review