Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: A report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry

Open access
Goldfarb, David S., Fischer, Mary E., Keich, Yona, Goldberg, Jack·2005·Kidney International

Abstract

BACKGROUND Nephrolithiasis is a complex phenotype that is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. We conducted a large twin study to examine genetic and nongenetic factors associated with stones. METHODS The VET Registry includes approximately 7500 male-male twin pairs born between 1939 to 1955 with both twins having served in the military from 1965 to 1975. In 1990, a mail and telephone health survey was sent to 11,959 VET Registry members; 8870 (74.2%) provided responses. The survey included a question asking if the individual had ever been told of having a kidney stone by a physician. Detailed dietary habits were elicited. In a classic twin study analysis, we compared concordance rates in monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins. We also conducted a cotwin control study of dietary risk factors in twins discordant for stones. RESULTS Among dizygotic twins, there were 17 concordant pairs and 162 discordant pairs for kidney stones. Among monozygotic twins, there were 39 concordant pairs and 163 discordant pairs. The proband concordance rate in MZ twins (32.4%) was significantly greater than the rate in DZ twins (17.3%) (chi(2)= 12.8; P < 0.001), consistent with a genetic influence. The heritability of the risk for stones was 56%. In the multivariate analysis of twin pairs discordant for kidney stones, we found a protective dose-response pattern of coffee drinking (P= 0.03); those who drank 5 or more cups of coffee were half as likely to develop kidney stones as those who did not drink coffee (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2, 0.9). Those who drank at least 1 cup of milk per day were half as likely to report kidney stones (OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.3, 0.8). There were also marginally significant protective effects of increasing numbers of cups of tea per day and frequent consumption of fruits and vegetables. Other factors such as the use of calcium supplements, alcohol drinking, consumption of solid dairy products, and the amount of animal protein consumed were not significantly related to kidney stones in the multivariate model. CONCLUSION These results confirm that nephrolithiasis is at least in part a heritable disease. Coffee, and perhaps tea, fruits, and vegetables were found to be protective for stone disease. This is the first twin study of kidney stones, and represents a new approach to elucidating the relative roles of genetic and environmental factors associated with stone formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Goldfarb, D. S., Fischer, M. E., Keich, Y., & Goldberg, J.
Venue
Kidney International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
1053-1061
ISSN
0085-2538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108135980
Cited by
289
References
1
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: A report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x
The paper
Goldfarb, D. S., Fischer, M. E., Keich, Y., & Goldberg, J. (2005). A twin study of genetic and dietary influences on nephrolithiasis: A report from the Vietnam Era Twin (VET) Registry. Kidney International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00170.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.