Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous Labor Support for Middle‐Class Couples: Effect on Cesarean Delivery Rates

McGrath, Susan K., Kennell, John H.·2008·Birth

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Previous randomized controlled studies in several different settings demonstrated the positive effects of continuous labor support by an experienced woman (doula) for low‐income women laboring without the support of family members. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to examine the perinatal effects of doula support for nulliparous middle‐income women accompanied by a male partner during labor and delivery. Methods: Nulliparous women in the third trimester of an uncomplicated pregnancy were enrolled at childbirth education classes in Cleveland, Ohio, from 1988 through 1992. Of the 686 prenatal women recruited, 420 met enrollment criteria and completed the intervention. For the 224 women randomly assigned to the experimental group, a doula arrived shortly after hospital admission and remained throughout labor and delivery. Doula support included close physical proximity, touch, and eye contact with the laboring woman, and teaching, reassurance, and encouragement of the woman and her male partner. Results: The doula group had a significantly lower cesarean delivery rate than the control group (13.4% vs 25.0%, p = 0.002), and fewer women in the doula group received epidural analgesia (64.7% vs 76.0%, p = 0.008). Among women with induced labor, those supported by a doula had a lower rate of cesarean delivery than those in the control group (12.5% vs 58.8%, p = 0.007). On questionnaires the day after delivery, 100 percent of couples with doula support rated their experience with the doula positively. Conclusions: For middle‐class women laboring with the support of their male partner, the continuous presence of a doula during labor significantly decreased the likelihood of cesarean delivery and reduced the need for epidural analgesia. Women and their male partners were unequivocal in their positive opinions about laboring with the support of a doula. (BIRTH 35:2 June 2008)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-536x.2008.00221.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1056/NEJM198009113031101 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1136/bmj.293.6547.585 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1001/jama.1991.03460170051032 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb13479.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/nur.4770120504 · DOI
  6. 10.3109/01674829009084420 · DOI
  7. Klaus MH, 1992, Maternal assistance and support in labor: Father, nurse, midwife, or doula?, Clin Consult Obstet Gynecol, 4, 211
  8. SPSS Inc, 1999, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Version 9.0.1
  9. 10.3109/01674829009084421 · DOI
  10. Lohn B, 1992, Comparison of fathers and doulas as supportive labor companions, Ped Res, 31
  11. Brooks AK, 1995, Supportive behaviors of men and women during labor, Ped Res, 31
  12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92341-6 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1542/peds.99.3.415 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90015-B · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00269-W · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1203/00006450-199704001-00100 · doi:10.1203/00006450-199704001-00100

Cited by

See all 173

Metadata

Authors
McGrath, S. K., & Kennell, J. H.
Venue
Birth
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-05-27
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
92-97
ISSN
  • 0730-7659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-536X
OpenAlex
W2057272181
Cited by
173
References
0
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous Labor Support for Middle‐Class Couples: Effect on Cesarean Delivery Rates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1523-536x.2008.00221.x
The paper
McGrath, S. K., & Kennell, J. H. (2008). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Continuous Labor Support for Middle‐Class Couples: Effect on Cesarean Delivery Rates. Birth. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536x.2008.00221.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.