Cited by 181Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Nutrition and HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Breastfeeding Rates and Hospital Breastfeeding Practices in Canada: A National Survey of Women

Chalmers, Beverley, Levitt, Cheryl, Heaman, Maureen, O'Brien, Beverley, Sauve, Reg, Kaczorowski, Janusz, for the Maternity Experiences Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System, Public Health Agency of Canada·2009·Birth

Abstract

Background: The Baby‐Friendly Hospital Initiative was launched by the World Health Organization and UNICEF in 1989 to promote, protect, and support breastfeeding worldwide. The objective of this study was to report breastfeeding rates and adherence to the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative of the World Health Organization and UNICEF in Canada, as reported by participants in the Maternity Experiences Survey of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Methods: Eligible women (n = 8,244) were identified from a randomly selected sample of infants born 3 months before the May 2006 Canadian Census, and stratified by province or territory. Birth mothers living with their infants at the time of interview were invited to participate in a computer‐assisted telephone interview conducted by Statistics Canada on behalf of the Public Health Agency of Canada. Interviews took approximately 45 minutes and were completed when infants were between 5 and 10 months old (between 9 and 14 months in the territories). Completed responses were obtained from 6,421 women (78% response rate). Nineteen of 309 questions concerned early mother‐infant contact and breastfeeding practices. Results: Breastfeeding intention (90.0%) and initiation (90.3%) rates were high, although exclusive breastfeeding rates at 6 months after birth (14.4%) were lower than desirable. The findings suggested a low adherence to several best practices advocated by the Baby‐Friendly Hospital Initiative. Conclusion: Although breastfeeding initiation rates were relatively high in Canada, exclusive breastfeeding duration fell short of globally recommended standards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1523-536x.2009.00309.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chalmers, B., Levitt, C., Heaman, M., O'Brien, B., Sauve, R., Kaczorowski, J., & for the Maternity Experiences Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System, P. H. A. O. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Chalmers, Beverley
Venue
Birth
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-28
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
122-132
ISSN
  • 0730-7659 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-536X
OpenAlex
W2094077915
Cited by
181
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Birth (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
breastfeeding rates, Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative, exclusive breastfeeding, breastfeeding initiation, breastfeeding intention, early mother-infant contact, Canada
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Breast Feeding, Canada, Female, Health Promotion, Hospitals, Maternity, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mothers, Postnatal Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, United Nations, World Health Organization, Guideline Adherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review