The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recurrence Rates of Treated Basal Cell Carcinomas: Part 2: Curettage‐Electrodesiccation
Abstract
This is the second article in a series that reviews the experience in the Skin and Cancer Unit, from 1955 through 1982, with the treatment of basal cell carcinomas (BCCs). This report deals with 2314 previously untreated (primary) BCCs removed by curettage‐electrodesiccation. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing lesion diameter (P < .001), high‐risk anatomic sites (nose, paranasal, nasal‐labial groove, ear, chin, mandibular, peri‐oral, and peri‐ocular areas) (P < .001), middle‐risk anatomical sites (scalp, forehead, pre‐ and post‐auricular, and malar areas) (P < .001), and time‐span treated (1955 to 1963) (P = .012) were independent risk factors for high recurrence rates. The patient's age, sex, and lesion duration before treatment did not affect the recurrence rates. In order to best illustrate our current experience with BCCs, the last time‐span (1973 to 1982) was examined in detail. For the low‐risk sites (neck, trunk, and four extremities), BCCs of all diameters responded well to curettage‐electrodesiccation with an overall 5‐year recurrence rate of 3.3% (SE = 1.5%) determined by the modified life‐table method. In the middle‐risk sites BCCs less than 10 mm in diameter had a recurrence rate of 5.3% (SE = 2.7%). Finally, in the high‐risk sites, lesions less than 6 mm in diameter had a recurrence rate of 4.5% (SE = 2.6%). Thus, BCCs less than 6 mm in diameter, regardless of anatomic site, as well as selected larger BCCs depending on their anatomic site, are effectively treated by currettage‐electro‐desiccation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Telfer, N. R., Colver, G. B., & Morton, C. A. (2008) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08666.x · Cited by 960
Guidelines of care for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Bichakjian, C., Armstrong, A., Baum, C., Bordeaux, J. S., Brown, M., Busam, K. J., Eisen, D. B., Iyengar, V., Lober, C., Margolis, D. J., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.10.006 · Cited by 499
A Systematic Review of Treatment Modalities for Primary Basal Cell Carcinomas
Thissen, M. R. T. M., Neumann, M. H. A., & Schouten, L. J. (1999) · Archives of Dermatology · doi:10.1001/archderm.135.10.1177 · Cited by 388
Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma
Telfer, Colver, & Bowers (1999) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03033.x · Cited by 339
Basal Cell Skin Cancer, Version 1.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Bichakjian, C. K., Olencki, T., Aasi, S. Z., Alam, M., Andersen, J. S., Berg, D., Bowen, G. M., Cheney, R. T., Daniels, G. A., Glass, L. F., et al. (2016) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2016.0065 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- SILVERMAN, M. K., KOPF, A. W., GRIN, C. M., BART, R. S., & LEVENSTEIN, M. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 720-726
- ISSN
- 0148-0812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110273371
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recurrence Rates of Treated Basal Cell Carcinomas: Part 2: Curettage‐Electrodesiccation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1991.tb03425.x
- The paper
- SILVERMAN, M. K., KOPF, A. W., GRIN, C. M., BART, R. S., & LEVENSTEIN, M. J. (1991). Recurrence Rates of Treated Basal Cell Carcinomas: Part 2: Curettage‐Electrodesiccation. The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1991.tb03425.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.