The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines with C. Botulinum‐A Exotoxin
Abstract
Eighteen patients with glabellar frown lines were treated with C. botulinum‐A exotoxin. Sixteen of the 17 patients followed showed improvement for periods ranging from 3 months to 11 months. Side‐effects were minimal and transient. Because C. botulinum‐A exotoxin therapy of glabellar frown lines treats the underlying cause of these lines, it is more effective than soft tissue augmentation although this improvement is temporary. Treatment with C. botulinum‐A exotoxin is a simple, safe procedure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The major role of clinicians in the discovery of off-label drug therapies
DeMonaco, H. J., Ali, A., & von Hippel, E. (2006) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1592/phco.26.3.323 · Cited by 142
Wang, Y., Wang, M., Xiao, S., Pan, P., Li, P., & Huo, J. (2013) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-013-0009-9 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- CARRUTHERS, J. D. A., & CARRUTHERS, J. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-21
- ISSN
- 0148-0812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097878172
- Cited by
- 612
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines with C. Botulinum‐A Exotoxin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03295.x
- The paper
- CARRUTHERS, J. D. A., & CARRUTHERS, J. A. (1992). Treatment of Glabellar Frown Lines with C. Botulinum‐A Exotoxin. The Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03295.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
