The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nonmelanocytic Lesions Defying the Two-Step Dermoscopy Algorithm
Abstract
The first step of the two-step algorithm of dermoscopy aims at differentiating melanocytic from nonmelanocytic pigmented lesions, using a stepwise evaluation for the presence of specific dermoscopic criteria. The purpose of this article is to heighten awareness of clinicians to nonmelanocytic lesions that defy the two-step algorithm, thus simulating melanocytic lesions dermoscopically. Seborrheic keratosis, solar lentigo, dermatofibroma, and supernumerary accessory nipple may present with network-like structures. Seborrheic keratosis, dermatofibroma, subcorneal hemorrhage, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and cutaneous metastases of breast and other cancers may contain pigmented globules. Peripheral streaks can also be seen in seborrheic keratosis and BCC. Homogenous bluish pigmentation, simulating a blue nevus, can also be seen in benign vascular lesions, Kaposi sarcoma, radiation tattoo, and BCC. This overlap of features between melanocytic and nonmelanocytic lesions suggests that integration of all dermoscopic features in the lesion, rather than a stepwise evaluation, may facilitate reaching the correct diagnosis in select cases as outlined in this article.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dermatoscopes in the primary care setting can inform decisions for biopsy and timely referral to dermatology, improve diagnostic accuracy of pigmented lesions, and facilitate earlier detection of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma.
“Dermatoscopes in the primary care setting can inform decisions for biopsy and timely referral to dermatology, improve diagnostic accuracy of pigmented lesions, and facilitate earlier detection of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma9–20.”
From Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1067/mjd.2003.281 · DOI
- Yadav S, 1993, Am J Dermatopathol, 15, 297, 10.1097/00000372-199308000-00001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0733-8635(05)70264-3 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02002.x · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.138.12.1556 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archderm.139.3.389-b · DOI
- Marghoob AA, 2005, Atlas of dermoscopy
- 10.1001/archderm.140.6.776 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0733-8635(05)70272-2 · DOI
- 10.1067/mjd.2000.109842 · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.141.1.122 · DOI
- 10.1097/00000372-199702000-00007 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06617.x · DOI
- 10.1038/modpathol.3800384 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06717.x · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.139.7.948-b · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.133.4.540 · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.140.1.128 · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.140.9.1169-b · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.140.12.1485 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06844.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30381.x · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.136.8.1012 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01302.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2004.01458.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.00864.x · DOI
- Azzopardi JG, 1977, Histopathology, 1, 21, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1977.tb01641.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0738-081X(02)00216-X · DOI
- 10.1097/00008390-200410000-00006 · DOI
- Kienle A, 1996, Appl Optics, 35, 1151, 10.1364/AO.35.001151 · DOI
- Haselow RE, 1980, Radiology, 134, 542, 10.1148/radiology.134.2.7352251 · DOI
- Fujita H, 1988, Arch Histol Cytol, 51, 285, 10.1679/aohc.51.285 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dermoscopy practice guidelines for use in telemedicine
Deda, L. C., Goldberg, R. H., Jamerson, T. A., Lee, I., & Tejasvi, T. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00587-9 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- SCOPE, A., BENVENUTO-ANDRADE, C., AGERO, A. L. C., & MARGHOOB, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- SCOPE, ALON
- BENVENUTO-ANDRADE, CRISTIANE
- AGERO, ANNA LIZA C.
- MARGHOOB, ASHFAQ A.
- Venue
- Dermatologic Surgery
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1398-1406
- ISSN
- 1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4725
- OpenAlex
- W2156495081
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cancer and Skin Lesions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Keywords
- seborrheic keratosis, solar lentigo, dermatofibroma, basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous metastasis, Kaposi's sarcoma, dermoscopic diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Decision Trees, Humans, Nevus, Predictive Value of Tests, Skin Neoplasms, Melanoma, Amelanotic, Dermoscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review