Cited by 33Hair Growth and DisordersOcular Surface and Contact LensGlaucoma and retinal disorders

Safety, Effectiveness, and Subjective Experience with Topical Bimatoprost 0.03% for Eyelash Growth

Yoelin, Steve, Walt, John G., Earl, Melissa·2010·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND Ocularly applied bimatoprost 0.03% is associated with increased eyelash growth. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety, efficacy, and subjective experience of using dermal application of bimatoprost 0.03% for the growth of natural eyelashes. METHODS Prospective, open-label study of subjects who desired longer, thicker (fuller), and darker natural eyelashes. Bimatoprost was applied to the upper lid margin once daily for 12 weeks. Adverse events and intraocular pressure were assessed, and subjects completed health outcomes questionnaires. Eyelash growth and darkening were scored using photographs taken at weeks 1 and 12. RESULTS All subjects were female (N=28). No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported. The mean change from baseline intraocular pressure was less than 1 mmHg at each time point, but was statistically significant at weeks 1 and 4 (p≤.047). At week 12, all subjects had noticed significant growth or darkening. Post hoc analysis of photographs corroborated these reports (p<.001). CONCLUSION Bimatoprost was found safe for eyelid application and was associated with enhanced eyelash growth. All subjects noticed favorable changes in the appearance of their eyelashes. This study was funded by an unrestricted investigator-initiated research grant from Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA. J. Walt is a health outcomes researcher and an employee of Allergan. Steve Yoelin and Melissa Earl have no proprietary interest in bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% or in Allergan, Inc. Medical writing assistance provided by Elizabeth Davis, PhD, Pacific Communications, Costa Mesa, CA. Editorial assistance provided by Health Learning Systems, Parsippany, NJ. Funding for editorial assistance provided by Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01519.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoelin, S., Walt, J. G., & Earl, M.
Corresponding author
Yoelin, Steve
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2010-05
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
638-649
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968627083
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Dermatologic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
bimatoprost, eyelash growth, topical ophthalmic solution, intraocular pressure, adverse events, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Bimatoprost, Administration, Topical, Adult, Aged, Amides, Antihypertensive Agents, Cloprostenol, Eyelashes, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review