Cited by 98Wound Healing and TreatmentsDermatologic Treatments and ResearchMast cells and histamine

The mast cell stabilizer ketotifen prevents development of excessive skin wound contraction and fibrosis in red Duroc pigs

Open access
Gallant‐Behm, Corrie L., Hildebrand, Kevin A., Hart, David A.·2008·Wound Repair and Regeneration

Abstract

Skin wound healing in Yorkshire pigs closely approximates human wound healing. Conversely, red Duroc pigs form fibroproliferative, hypercontractile scars. As mast cells have been implicated in several fibrotic conditions, the present study used these models to evaluate the potential role of mast cells in wound contraction and fibrosis. Immediately following the creation of full‐thickness excisional wounds, the mast cell stabilizer ketotifen was used to treat both Yorkshire and red Durocs. Control red Durocs showed significantly more wound contraction than Yorkshires, both before and after reepithelialization. Ketotifen treatment significantly reduced the first phase of contraction in red Duroc wounds to a level equivalent to Yorkshire wounds, but had no detectable effect on the postepithelialization phase of contraction. Cessation of drug treatment after 10 weeks did not lead to resumption of excessive contraction in red Durocs, indicating that ketotifen blocked rather than delayed such contraction during a critical phase of healing. Ketotifen treatment also reduced the deposition of collagen within the red Duroc wounds, but did not affect Yorkshire wound contraction or collagen deposition. These results suggest that ketotifen may be an effective treatment for the reduction of excessive wound contraction and fibrosis in human cutaneous injuries, without affecting the normal healing process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-475x.2008.00363.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activated mast cells are more abundant in hypertrophic scars than normal scars, release cytokines, histamine, and serotonin, and are required for myofibroblast proliferation, wound contracture, and hypertrophic scarring.

    “Notably, activated mast cells are more abundant in hypertrophic scars than in normal scars; they release cytokines, histamine, and serotonin, and they are required for myofibroblast proliferation, wound contracture, and the hypertrophic scarring (262–264).”

    From Chemiexcitation: Mammalian Photochemistry in the Dark<sup>†</sup> (2023) · cites this paper as [264]

    The Abstract and Discussion report increased mast-cell numbers in hypertrophic scars, histamine and cytokine release, and a possible role in excessive wound contraction and scarring. They do not establish that activated mast cells are more abundant than in normal scars, mention serotonin release, or show that mast cells are required for myofibroblast proliferation or hypertrophic scarring. The Discussion explicitly says mast cells are not absolutely required for normal wound contraction. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hildebrand KA, Zhang M, Salo PT, Hart DA. Post-trau- matic elbow contractures are associated with elevations in mast cells and neuropeptides in the joint capsule. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15: A20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallant‐Behm, C. L., Hildebrand, K. A., & Hart, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Hart, David A.
Venue
Wound Repair and Regeneration
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
226-233
ISSN
  • 1067-1927 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-475X
OpenAlex
W2070167505
Cited by
98
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Calgary Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Institute of Gender and Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
Keywords
ketotifen, mast cell stabilizers, wound contraction, scar fibrosis, Large White pigs, full-thickness excisional wounds, re-epithelialization, collagen deposition, skin wound healing, mast cells
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Female, Fibrosis, Ketotifen, Mast Cells, Skin, Wound Healing, Sus scrofa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review