Cited by 131Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementAcute Kidney Injury ResearchPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

PROGRESS IN UREMIC TOXIN RESEARCH: Guanidino Compounds as Uremic (Neuro)Toxins

De Deyn, Peter Paul, Vanholder, Raymond, Eloot, Sunny, Glorieux, Griet·2009·Seminars in Dialysis

Abstract

Neurological and vascular impairment are important sources of morbidity in patients with renal failure. A portion of patients still suffers from uremic encephalopathy or other signs of nervous system impairment. Several reports demonstrate increased incidence of cardiac infarction and cerebrovascular accidents in chronic renal failure patients, even in those otherwise adequately dialyzed. Epileptic and cognitive symptoms are among the most typical manifestations of uremic encephalopathy. Several guanidino compounds (GCs) may play an important role in the etiology of uremic encephalopathy. Four GCs appeared to be substantially increased as well in serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and brain of uremic patients. These compounds, “uremic” GCs, are creatinine, guanidine (G), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA), and methylguanidine. All four compounds are experimental convulsants in concentrations similar to those found in uremic brain. We described a possible mechanism for the contribution of GCs to uremic hyperexcitability, referring to the in vitro effects of uremic GCs on inhibitory and excitatory amino acid receptors. It was demonstrated that the excitatory effects of uremic GCs on the central nervous system can be explained by the activation of N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptors by GSA, concomitant inhibition of γ‐aminobutyric acid type A receptors by uremic GCs, and other depolarizing effects. These effects might also indicate the putative contribution of uremic GCs to the etiology of uremic encephalopathy. In this article, we review the uremic GCs with particular attention to their neurotoxicity. We elaborate in detail on the mechanisms of action of the neurotoxic uremic GCs and summarize the kinetics of these toxins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1525-139x.2009.00577.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Deyn, P. P., Vanholder, R., Eloot, S., & Glorieux, G.
Affiliations
Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Venue
Seminars in Dialysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
340-345
ISSN
  • 0894-0959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-139X
OpenAlex
W2120453226
Cited by
131
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Dialysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
uremic toxins, guanidino compounds, uremic encephalopathy, neurotoxicity, chronic kidney disease, NMDA receptor, GABAA receptor, guanidinosuccinic acid, methylguanidine, guanidine, creatinine, glutamate receptors, convulsants, cerebrovascular disease, epilepsy, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Brain, Guanidines, Humans, Toxins, Biological, Uremia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review